Deuteronomy 10:16-18 16 Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart, and be no more stiffnecked. 17 For the LORD your God is God of gods, and Lord of lords, a great God, a mighty, and a terrible, which regardeth not persons, nor taketh reward: 18 He doth execute the judgment of the fatherless and widow, and loveth the stranger, in giving him food and raiment.
Quote:
Genesis 17:9 9 And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and I will be their God. 10 This is my covenant, which ye shall keep, between me and you and thy seed after thee; Every man child among you shall be circumcised. 11 And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a token of the covenant betwixt me and you. 12 And he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every man child in your generations, he that is born in the house, or bought with money of any stranger, which is not of thy seed. 13 He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised: and my covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant.
Last edited by madthumbs on Sun Aug 24, 2008 8:13 pm; edited 8 times in total
So I am to trust a person who says that "circumcision causes irreversible brain damage"!
Hahah. Lol. Any person who thinks that their brain power partly comes from their penis is a quack and deserves to be exposed as one. This is disinfo and a blatant waste of time. Instead of starting wars with the religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam - why don't you sexual intercourse get a hint and focus on the zionists instead? I have been watching this site closely for quite a few months now and noticed how much anti-religion stuff goes on here. True, people acting in the name of religion have a lot to answer for, but do some research before condemning a practice that has been proven safe and a part of most peoples' lives.
What you should be exposing is FEMALE CIRCUMCISION. Now that is barbaric because an actual organ is removed which affects the female's sexual pleasure. That is considered mutilation. Removing a man's foreskin is an act of hygiene and does not reduce his pleasure one iota.
Oh, and I'm circumcised myself (i prefer not to have bits of pre-cum lodged under my penis).
I know its a gut reaction for people who are circumsized to defend their situation tooth and nail.
I wouldn't doubt that it causes some subconscious psychological issues in some people. This is a controversial issue, but it does need to be talked about due to its irrefutable barbarity as an act. There is nothing hygenic about circumcision aside from the fact that you have to wash slightly less down there since the glans becomes cauterized. I have friends who are circumsized who complain about their sexual sensitivity.
I'll take cleaning it a little more as opposed to losing sensitivity down there
I have friends who are circumsized who complain about their sexual sensitivity.
I'll take cleaning it a little more as opposed to losing sensitivity down there
How could they possibly know that they're less sensitive that anyone with a foreskin? That makes no sense.
It is true that they don't really know anything else physically. Most of there concern comes from literature they've read that describes decreased sensitivity due to the loss of nerve endings and the cauterizing of the glans, as well as my own testimony due to me being uncircumcised.
I have friends who are circumsized who complain about their sexual sensitivity.
I'll take cleaning it a little more as opposed to losing sensitivity down there
How could they possibly know that they're less sensitive that anyone with a foreskin? That makes no sense.
If I rub your arm with sandpaper day-in and day-out, doesn't it seem that, over time, your arm will be desensitized somewhat in that spot?
That's the same thing with the glans on the penis. An uncircumscised person's glans is 'sheathed', and doesn't rub against their underwear/clothing day-in and day-out. It is only exposed to the environment when the person is sexually excited, and as a consequence, it retains its sensitivity.
I have friends who are circumsized who complain about their sexual sensitivity.
I'll take cleaning it a little more as opposed to losing sensitivity down there
How could they possibly know that they're less sensitive that anyone with a foreskin? That makes no sense.
If I rub your arm with sandpaper day-in and day-out, doesn't it seem that, over time, your arm will be desensitized somewhat in that spot?
That's the same thing with the glans on the penis. An uncircumscised person's glans is 'sheathed', and doesn't rub against their underwear/clothing day-in and day-out. It is only exposed to the environment when the person is sexually excited, and as a consequence, it retains its sensitivity.
I have friends who are circumsized who complain about their sexual sensitivity.
I'll take cleaning it a little more as opposed to losing sensitivity down there
How could they possibly know that they're less sensitive that anyone with a foreskin? That makes no sense.
If I rub your arm with sandpaper day-in and day-out, doesn't it seem that, over time, your arm will be desensitized somewhat in that spot?
That's the same thing with the glans on the penis. An uncircumscised person's glans is 'sheathed', and doesn't rub against their underwear/clothing day-in and day-out. It is only exposed to the environment when the person is sexually excited, and as a consequence, it retains its sensitivity.
It really is quite obvious when you consider it.
Another myth exposed.
I have no problems with sensitivity; and even if what you say is true - it would make me last longer and be able to satisfy the woman more anyway.
Is mutilating yourself best way how to satisfy a woman ?
Ancient hindus developed tantra, which is a system highly beneficial to your body and soul.
Some people still prefer butchery.
Mon Sep 11, 2006 6:18 pm
Sponsor
Opiate
Joined: 14 Aug 2006 Posts: 243 Location: False Apostle Rebuttal below::READ IT
Im not circumcised and I did not circumcise my 3 boys, for 3 reasons. Not a requirement, no need to, foreskin is cool. Besides, most people should know, "circumcision is nothing."
Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:02 pm
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8183 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
Quote:
1 Corinthians 7:19 19 Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of God.
Quote:
Matthew 5:17 17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
