It's the same theme in every article of theirs. Mistrust everyone else, even people like Holocaust Deniers and people who expose the 9/11 lie, and trust the trio of Smith, Hufschmid and Bollyn. That's the conclusion at the end of every piece. Build up fear and suspicion - nobody is who they seem - and when you've got the reader where you want them - feeling mistrustful and paranoid - bring in soothing reassurance that there are people who are on your side, people whom you can trust: Smith, Hufschmid and Bollyn ....
.. Over and over again they do this - their websites are a repetition of this manipulation. Work the reader up and then when primed psychologically to be full of anxiety, reduce that anxiety by telling them that things are not all bad - you may not trust anyone else but you can trust these three people. It is like a light at the end of the tunnel, the soothing balm amid a hail of pinpricks on one's psyche. It is addictive and works. People feel that they know Smith, Bollyn and Hufschmid - that they are like their brothers or fathers - this trio understands your deepest fears. THEY will help negotiate the way in this valley of death, with traps set around ready to catch the unwary in their grips.
Trust these people, believe in these people, and you will receive salvation.... Smith, Hufschmid, Bollyn, trust ...... Smith, Hufschmid, Bollyn, safety .... Smith, Hufschmid, Bollyn, security ..... Smith, Hufschmid, Bollyn, answers .... Smith, Hufschmid, Bollyn, sanctuary ..... Smith, Hufschmid, Bollyn, an oasis of truth .... Smith, Hufschmid, Bollyn, protection .... Smith, Hufschmid, Bollyn, righteousness .... Smith, Huschmid, Bollyn, never wrong ..... Smith, Hufschmid, Bollyn, all-knowing ......
By placing all your faith in Smith, Hufschmid and Bollyn and letting them do all your thinking for you, the world can be 'a beautiful place'.
Daryl Smith and Eric Hufschmid's list of "Crypto-Zionists" includes Germar Rudolf, Ernst Zundel, Mark Glenn, David Irving, David Duke, Mike Piper, Mike Berger, Gerard Holmgren, Wayne Madsen, Kurt Nimmo, Webster Tarpley, Frank Whalen, Willis Carto, Christopher Petherick, John Stadtmiller, Dylan Avery, Curt Maynard, Alex Jones, Jeff Rense, Eustace Mullins, William Rodriguez, Mike Rivero, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Ellen Mariani, Sam Danner, Jim Hoffman, Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, and countless others. Hufschmid asserts that there are "thousands of Crypto-Zionist web sites" and there may be "hundreds of thousands - possibly millions -" of members in the Zionist movement, and 99% of the truth seekers are "somehow connected to the criminal network" and are "useless".
has been steadily growing as the evidence against them continues to mount up. They have even added me to their list of Crypto-Zionists, in response to my suggestion that they are agents. Yet Smith's gang slanders all these people, and then goes on to ask, "Why do people insult us?"
Smith's 'talent' is his ability to project an air of apparent 'sincerity', and to manipulate his guests into indulging in some ad-lib malicious gossip about individuals whom Smith is trying to label as "Crypto-Zionists". The bad news is that some decent people have heard his shows and fallen for his spiel. The good news is that Smith is a spent force. Guests soon realise how they have been manipulated and entrapped - e.g. Eustace Mullins - and decide they will have nothing more to do with Smith. So when he runs out of people, the only remaining guests on his show will be Hufschmid, Bollyn, and other Zionist agents.
The iamthewitless Gang of Three's absurdities includes the claims that: 1) Chris Bollyn, whilst he was a reporter at American Free Press (AFP), has done more to expose Zionism than everyone else put together. 2) AFP is a "Zionist-controlled" organization. Not only are both premises false, but both could not possibly be true at the same place and time and in the same Everettian world.
Smith's evidence for AFP being "Zionist-controlled" rests on his theory that Mark Lane is a "Zionist" who runs AFP, and Carto, Piper and Petherick are pedophiles or homosexuals who are being blackmailed by ADL handlers. Smith forgets that Mark Lane successfully defended Liberty Lobby, reversing a judgement that initially went in favor of E Howard Hunt. Smith's 'evidence' against Lane is that he was once phographed with Jane Fonda. His 'evidence' against William Rodriguez is that he was once photographed giving a "suspicious" handshake.
Smith says David Irving is a pedophile who was given the choice: Say the gas chambers were real, or you'll go to jail as a pedophile. Isn't it more likely that Irving was told: Admit you were wrong, and you'll serve one to two years maximum; otherwise, you'll do ten years for "holocaust denial"? And isn't it more likely that Smith is a pedophile and his bosses at Langley gave him the ultimatum: Work for us and you'll be protected, refuse and you'll go to jail as a pedophile?
Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:37 am
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8624 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
-First time I noticed a non- "Zionist did it" type article from them. Too bad Arsenic is a naturally occurring substance like radon, and is probably less harmful than most alternative pesticides (but is more well known as a poison). It's also in chicken feces which means that it's not collecting in the chicken and it hasn't killed the chicken who are consuming a larger portion of it.
Could they be promoting this obscure article to fool people into thinking they care? Why scaremonger with cancer when people are coming forward to affirm testimonials concerning cancer which cost nothing? http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=83
What solution is offered? Certainly all pesticides are bad, so without a solution they're pretty much switching one poison for another like they did with mercury in vaccines or DU in armor penetrating weapons. What about Neem?
Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:33 pm
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8624 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
Daryl Bradford Smith calls for the destruction of Israel
Quote:
This man makes Ernst Zundel look like a choir boy, why is Fritz Springmeier in jail and Daryl Bradford Smith runs the streets of this planet loose. This is hate propaganda and should be not tolerated. I am not a fan of Israeli policy but this is Hitler-style thinking.
He's quick to apologize for that big mouth of his. The problem is does he believe his own apologies?
If Eric is the owner of judicial-inc then they got a lot of explaining to do.
Thu May 10, 2007 3:59 pm
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8624 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
Regarding Eric's ownership. Apparently the domain was renewed the same exact day that the domain for Eric's site was. The style looks like Eric's work, the writing style is like Eric's, they promote each other.
Judicial-inc's got a lot of explaining to do for itself. Remember Slavo (Benjamin Freedman)? He tried getting me to promote Judicial-Inc also. Notice how long he lasted after we dropped their support.
Regarding Eric's ownership. Apparently the domain was renewed the same exact day that the domain for Eric's site was.
Actually, twas the judicial-inc domain that was renewed through godaddy the same day as the iamthewitness domain was renewed.... not Eric's personal site...
Also, shortly after that date which was around Feb 9 of this year, Daryl mentioned to me that Eric had renewed iamthewitness for him due to budget and/or logistical constraints.
nonetheless, isn't the simple promotion of judicial-inc (by any site other than a satirical one) problematic in itself? what serious journalistic site would expose itself to the scrutiny it invites by linking to the crude, wildly inaccurate, usually slanderous content found at judicial?
maybe iamthewitness is just an unsuccessful satire site, never intended to be anything but insipid entertainment?
It is more truthful than the MSM on the whole and the MSM is regarded as 'reputable' media so I wouldn't go by what people say has got a good reputation or not. Judicial Inc is like a pioneer; it breaks stories that you wouldn't have found out anywhere else like the Zionist connection in the Natalee Holloway case. Stories that journos would know of but won't be able to write about because their Jewish masters won't let them.
Of course I don't believe what it says about EVERY single thing: for instance I disagree with its bashing of Irving, and the Skunk seems to support Smith and Hufschmid. But it's a site run by an individual so there are going to be areas of disagreement. Everything should be read with a discriminating eye needless to say.
I find it useful as a starting point to investigate issues and news and events that I would never have heard of before. After checking things for myself, many times I've come to the same conclusion as the website's author; a few times, I haven't.
As an aside, I must say I love the Skunk's sense of humor; his caricatures of "Holocaust" Jewish victims is hilarious. Some of the 'polls' are a riot too.
Fri May 18, 2007 5:07 pm
dumby
Joined: 10 Aug 2006 Posts: 263 Location: kalifornia
have you seen dbs trying to speak against religious zealots? what a jackass.
what a pathetic attempt to save listeners!
notice he doesnt say anything about what is wrong with world religions... he just makes sure we all know that he isnt supporting any of them.....
i dont know how he can say this, with all the hateful christians he has on his show!
theyre not the ignorant, well-meaning kind that you and i have come across..
they are the fanatical, racist christians who want power and for their denomination of christianity to dominate everything.
I think some Christians are quite up on the Jews information-wise, and their animosity towards Jews doesn't generally arise from resentment that Jews killed Jesus in my thinking. The 'Jews are hated because they killed Jesus' is a red herring that Jews often throw out to take away attention from the real reasons for people disliking them as a group. And they mistakenly assume most people they are talking to who don't like Jews are Christians - I'm not a Christian and couldn't care less whether Jews or some other group killed Jesus. My mindset about the origins of humans and society doesn't revolve around the Middle East, Noah's Ark, Abraham, Adam and Eve. It's kind of egocentric for Jews to believe their people and history are at the center of the human universe and that their particular Middle Eastern-centric ancestral line gave birth to the human race.
I would say that most Christians are unconcerned with Jews having been the people who 'killed' Jesus; this is inaccurate anyway - it was the leaders of the Jews who wanted Jesus dead, not ALL Jews were involved. And the Romans were the people who actually put him to death but nobody goes on about the Romans.
The main reasons some Christians are against the Jews are:
1) The behavior of Jews: they act as a separate nation of people within the host nations that they live in and they as a group are in the business of usurping the sovereignty of the nation and taking it over for themselves using Mafia-like tactics, and also conspire to cover up the actions of themselves and fellow Jews. They care nothing for the longterm welfare of the country and only care for the welfare of their little group of people. They will use up, destroy, despoil, ruin and so long as the Jews stay on top and turn a nice profit, it doesn't matter to them that the country is trashed by their behavior.
They have no noble ideals and no consideration for the ideals of the host people such as the freedoms and the rights their ancestors shed their blood for. They leave a country much worse off than before they came.
They also like to get cosy with the elite and carve out a special status for themselves and keep the populace under their boot, using oppressive tactics as a means. This way they with the elite can keep exploiting the people, divide the booty among themselves and shut up any dissent. Dissidents are tortured or imprisoned or otherwise persecuted in a Jew-dominated society. Real patriots are the enemy of the Jews. Society usually has turned into a police state by the time the Jews have reached the apotheosis of their power in the host country.
2) The Jewish religion is a pathological religion. It is 'anti-religion' in a sense. Their Talmud preaches that Jews must conquer the world and that not only is it OK to use immoral techniques to achieve that goal, it is an imperative from God that they must do so. Thus Jews have achieved a bad reputation over the years: they are known as people who can't be trusted; people who lie, cheat, and even murder with equanimity. Jews are aware of their reputation and so have learned to hide the fact they are Jewish. They won't be open about it eg. on messageboards and try and stop people from discussing the Jews at all. They know that their immoral/amoral culture and attitude to non-Jews will eventually come to light in discourse about them. It is not so easy to hide the truth even for people who are so controlling of it as they are.
3) No religious organization likes another; all the religions of the world are in a state of tension with one another; they would all like to dominate the world. Jews recognize Christianity to be a powerful religion in the host countries of the west they want to dominate (and do); hence the Jews see Christians as the enemy. They try and put down Christians whenever they can; they wage a propaganda war against them in the media and in other channels. Don't be deceived that they do so because Jews are anti-religion - if they were they would treat Judaism the same way. And you hardly ever hear of jews treating Judaism like they do Christianity. Indeed they keep quiet about it as much as possible because they know there are many things in their religion that non-Jews wouldn't like. And Israel was a country founded in religion's name so they would be hypocrites as well if they claimed this anti-religion excuse. Most Christians are aware of this animosity and have no love for the Jews.
I've learned quite a lot of things about Jews from Christian websites. Not all Christian websites are the same: some denounce other Christian websites that openly discuss Jews as being 'anti-semitic' websites and try and distance themselves from them; and some even openly support Jews (the Christian-Zionists).
And what I read on the website about Jews I am not going to accept 100% as the gospel truth. I will cast a critical eye over it as I do everything else.
But I am not going to discount what I read simply because I don't agree with the Christian content of the sites. The truth is the truth no matter where it comes from.
I take what seems to be factual and discard the rest. Accepting that some of their stuff is informative and correct isn't going to turn me into a Christian, just as gleaning information from an Israeli website isn't going to make me pro-Israeli.
Fri May 18, 2007 10:19 pm
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8624 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
Quote:
They try and put down Christians whenever they can; they wage a propaganda war against them in the media and in other channels.
Couldn't they simply point out that the prophecies they have concerning Jesus are taken out of context or added to their Torah by the Church? How about all the similarities between older Gods and Jesus, or how the Bible's text itself reveals that the author of most of the New Testament was a fraud? I don't see these hard hitting issues being brought up in the media.
I think Christianity is a tool for them. It's Christian churches that donate to Israel. The ones that don't support Israel support the hate crime laws for them to hide behind. Any attention they give Christianity probably has a more positive outcome for the church.
You guys are way out the loop if you don't know why Darly is bashing religious fanatics, and I think you guys are doing it purposefully because you don't want people to know about the name PlanetQuo which is most likely the reason for that audio. Maybe the tieing tread is a some what worthy information regarding MadThumb's name, if MT is bothering to keep from being public. Search in PQ's website folks, if u wanna know. You'll see the Pope and bible share a commonality, if that's Mads real name.
Anyways, PlanetQuo does a good exposer of Darly which should be an embarrasement to this forum, since its compilation of goods on Darly is weak compared to it.
To the point, it has to do with Suzzette formerly known as the Goy Defender and an offensive and childish email sent to her by nobody than Darly Bradford Smith. Shame on you Darly. You're deterioting to an embarrasment with that mouth of yours. Of course, PQ has more on Darly which does make you think but it isn't definitive, if you wanna play it safe.
Funny, I been seeing the number "11" a lot lately. It's driving me crazy. So the post before is my 111 and it was posted on 9:11am.
Sun May 20, 2007 9:14 am
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8624 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
PlanetQuo is even less credible and more laughable than Daryl. If you really need it, I'll take some time and tear apart one of his articles for you. I've seen what he had, and if it were anything; it would have been brought up here.
What was Daryl calling Eric and Christopher on last night's show? Spineless scum or something like that because they haven't arrested anyone yet. -Easy for him to say from France. Then he whines about character assassins that attack him and not his research.. Well Daryl acted just like Alex Jones calling us Satanic and whines about us quite a bit. Does he attack our research? Daryl should keep pointing the finger. Now that's just pointing out his hypocrisy, the fact that he lies and has a racist agenda discredits any research he gives us. Pointing to fabricated articles from their own Judicial Inc shouldn't be considered research.
