Theories That Distract From Reality

Posts: 237

The glass causes caustical effects like sundogs, halos, glories, circumzenic arcs, etcetera.

It even squishes the moon if you look through the glass from a very acute angle.

Posts: 237

Thank God for the glass in the sky.

Posts: 8221

Is this where you're going?

	Quote:
	Genesis 1:6-7 6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. 7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v13/i2/firmament.asp wrote:

Anti-Christian sceptics often denounce the Bible as teaching a faulty cosmology. One example is the assertion that the Hebrew word raqiya‘, or ‘firmament’ in the KJV, denotes a solid dome over the earth, so that the Bible is guilty of scientific error. Such enemies of the Gospel have an ally in the professing evangelical Paul H. Seely, who maintains that both the social background data and the text of the Bible itself support this conclusion.

Seely’s conclusion is both presumptuous and untenable, and he fails to recognize that the description of the raqiya‘ is so equivocal and lacking in detail that one can only read a solid sky into the text by assuming that it is there in the first place. One can, however, justifiably understand Genesis to be in harmony with what we presently know about the nature of the heavens.

-Even if you prove there's glass in they sky; we've already proved the Bible is bullshit. Wink

Posts: 237

	madthumbs wrote:
	Is this where you're going? "Quote: Genesis 1:6-7 6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. 7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. "

no.

	Quote:
	Even if you prove there's glass in they sky; we've already proved the Bible is bullshit.

Do you admit there is glass in the sky?

You can take time to think about it if you wish.

Posts: 1334

Cyrus you are ......

You present some physical phenomena which are related to

PROPAGATION OF LIGHT IN MEDIA

and attribute them to GLASS.

The effects you mentioned are related to ATHMOSPHERE and the medium is AIR.

You attribute creation of OZONE to glass, because you saw glass involved in apparature for creating ozone.
Your all knowing, from JHVH orders receiving mind was NOT able to comprehend that actual process of CREATION of OZONE has ZERO to do with glass, the creation of OZONE in process is of ELECTROMAGNETIC NATURE and glass is used as INSULATOR.

Following your train of thought the glass would be responsible for creation of fluorescent light in neon bulbs.

I have a news for you - GLASS IS USED AS AN INSULATOR.

Posts: 8221

Regarding glass blocking UV (Which we often hear when we're buying glasses *optical*):

http://www.wonderquest.com/sunburn.htm wrote:

Q: Can you get sunburned through a car windshield? --Brad, Loma Linda, California

A: Only if you try hard. A car's windshield blocks about 85% of the sun's ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Other car windows block only about half.

Heat waves pass through glass and get absorbed by our bodies. So, the sun's rays can heat us shining through a windshield.

We absorb UV the most, microwave the least.€Glass protects us, though, from the UV portion. It absorbs most of the UV like an exceptionally effective sunscreen. Good thing, too, because skin absorbs almost all the UV rays that reach it.

Posts: 237

This looks like glass to me.

Hope I'm not offending you.

Posts: 419

If a huge hunk of silicon were flying in space and hit the atmosphere, it would likely melt and turn into glass. That's not so terribly difficult to understand or explain. To jump from that to postulating that there is a huge dome surrounding the entire Earth is beyond ridiculous.

How did Hubble get up there? What about the various probes we've launched through it? Are we to believe that these were all hoaxes too? Come on...this doesn't even qualify for the term 'conspiratorial.' It's just stupid, and detracts from the merits of far more legitimate claims.

Posts: 674

tiny bits of glass in the sky , probly... a dome... doubtful and since ive never been to space i couldnt tell u if its true or not...

if it was a dome of glass wouldnt it shatter when rocks fall from the sky... id imagine lots of glass every everytime a meteor fell...a glass dome bigger then the earth would some pretty big chunks of glass im sure....

my virdict... bs... of course thats just my oppinion Wink

Posts: 237

This is an ozone generator.

It has a glass encasement that yes, acts as the insulator.

This is the same concept as the glass in the sky.

It acts as the insulator and the ozone is generated from the sun's electrons.

The earth is a womb, not a convex planet, this is where you might be having the difficulty understanding.

I highly recommend watching the movie "Chicken Little"
Watch and see all the references they use to glass.
At least a handful. They are very sublime.
But also overt like when they are in the spaceship and CL says, "Don't tap the glass, they hate it when you do that."

If you can understand that Zionism is behind this, then you can understand the reality of glass in the sky.
It takes a complete unlearning, or unprogramming, but with God's help it can be done.

God bless you all my friends.

Posts: 674

	Cyrus the Shepherd wrote:
	It takes a complete unlearning, or unprogramming, but with God's help it can be done.

last i checked gods (or the ppl that invented god) are responsible for the programming in the first place...

glass is illusion just like everything else...

Posts: 419

	Cyrus the Shepherd wrote:
	It takes a complete unlearning

Unlearned is something you most definitely are....

Posts: 237

	alexclaton wrote:
	glass is illusion just like everything else...

This is a very strong illusion.

I'm duped. I buy there is glass in the sky.

Posts: 8221

	http://www.geocities.com/kidhistory/trauma/neuropsy.htm wrote:
	PTSD symptoms take on a biphasic repetition-compulsion pattern (intrusive recollections, revivification-autonomic hyperarousal) or magical fantasy undoing pattern (psychic numbing, denial, avoidance).

Posts: 237

	Quote:
	When one of my producers first told me about him, my first thought was: Stephen Jones is insane. And he may be. On the other hand, he does have a legitimate job and a responsible-sounding title. He's not living in the park, or writing me letters in crayon. How crazy could he really be? In the interest of open-mindedness, we booked him. That was probably a mistake.

Tucker Carlson