Is this constructed reality that is created by me in any way manipulated by another being/entity/person?
What I mean by that is although my thoughts may be creating reality is there someone/something manipulating my thoughts/how I think so that I create a specific reality to the benefit of the manipulator?
If so, is this "person" yet another sentient aspect of the singular mind?
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8624 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
Hollow earth, glass in the sky, 4-d reptilians, 2012, bending spoons and a whole bunch of other unprovable / debunked shit people like to spam this site with. Gambling addicts think they're gonna win and fail. The only point I can see to giving this crap any merit is to discredit the rest of the information on the site. That is what it's doing in REALITY. If the shit worked: you would have control over my perception and acceptance of it, but do you? We have life saving information here, and my tolerance for mixing it with this crap is growing thin.
There are things going on that we don't yet understand, so lets pretend we do and label it QM! Lets roll with some small scientific findings and associate it with our nonsense to validate it.There are other sites that are more welcoming to this crap like: http://www.davidicke.com/forum/ which serve a much larger audience. -So why here?
Hey man, I'm not saying I believe it, I'm asking how it's supposed to work. Are we not allowed to discuss philosophies we disagree with?
Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:55 am
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8624 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
I was in a mood last night when posting that. We've banned people for repeatedly posting nonsense on this forum by popular request of the VIP group when the site was more active. I suppose I could just move stuff to the public waste dump, and I understand this is the Mosh Pit. I have no desire to ban, and don't like to censor but creating bad impressions for a site are a form of censorship.
If someone new came along and started checking just the recent threads here, what would their impression of us be?
One of our member's father's is dying from MS. Is anyone else looking for evidence of a cure or identifying a cause (I suspect MSG as a cause)? -Or are we just delving into faith based initiatives and ignoring the helping people live better lives bit?
A positive attitude can get us far, but there is a limit to how far it gets us.
We've banned people for repeatedly posting nonsense on this forum
I wouldn't call it nonsense, there are some legitimate, scientific points to be made in this theory. Even religion has it's good points, to totally dismiss it is a mistake. This isn't being presented as fact, it's simply a discussion of an idea.
Quote:
If someone new came along and started checking just the recent threads here, what would their impression of us be?
I think their impression would be that this site provides a whole lot of very useful information as well as being open to discussion of theories and ideas we may or may not agree with. One can hold back judgment of a theory while trying to understand the aspects of it, and after it is properly understood then decide whether or not one believes it to be true. Any intelligent person viewing this thread would not take it as endorsement of the theory by this site, but only what it is, a discussion of an idea.
Quote:
One of our member's father's is dying from MS. Is anyone else looking for evidence of a cure or identifying a cause (I suspect MSG as a cause)? -Or are we just delving into faith based initiatives and ignoring the helping people live better lives bit?
We should continue looking for the cause and the cure. That does not mean we cannot debate philosophy.
I understand where you are coming from with this, you don't want this site to be like all the others, full of BS. But this isn't BS, it's an in depth exploration of a philosophical theory that's been around since ancient Greece. I do not necessarily believe it to be true on all accounts, but it has some hard to argue points, and I am trying to understand the theory in full before I make a judgment on it. Even if one completely disagrees with every point, it's at the very least a great exercise in debate and logic, following one point to the next using logic.
As far as certain points go:
It is indeed true that all of reality is experienced through the mind.
It is indeed impossible to prove that anything does actually exist outside of the mind, but the flip side of that is that it is not possible prove that nothing exists outside of the mind. Neither point is provable.
It is indeed true that the so called observation problem is a reality, science has proven this to be true at the sub atomic level, and it seems to be true on a personal level (ie, the act of observing anything inherently disrupts what you are observing, and possibly influences it, as well as the fact that if you believe something to be true about another person it is more likely that that person will exhibit this trait in your presence).
It is impossible to prove that a person can change reality by an act of thought.
It is impossible to prove that we all exist as fragments of a singular consciousness.
It is impossible to prove that we can change "frequency" at will.
It is impossible to prove that our thoughts create our reality, but it also impossible to prove that they don't.
So there, it's a circular thought process, but it's not nonsense, it is an ancient philosophy and an ancient debate, and a nice exercise in argument.
Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:32 am
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8624 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
Carry on then. Venting did me some good, and you're right.
Re: Prove other people exist beyond your experience of them.
madthumbs wrote:
We've banned people for repeatedly posting nonsense on this forum by popular request of the VIP group when the site was more active.
If you ban me, then I will respect your decision to do so. You see I enjoyed my time here. I realize we cannot agree on everything (most things). But that's ok with me.
madthumbs wrote:
If someone new came along and started checking just the recent threads here, what would their impression of us be?
Keep in mind though, not many people do post in your site. I just happen to be one of the active few in here who've been posting frequently. That being said, in all the years that I've been here, my post count has remained around 0.21 a day. If much more people helped to keep your forums more active and made more threads with different topics -- as opposed to just a handful of individuals (including myself) have been doing -- my perceived QM "spam" would appear to be less domineering, actually.
I've also said not too long ago that I'm intending to limit my QM-themed posts. The only consistent reason why I'm still discussing this as of now is because Peter Griffin wants to know more about it. I'll continue to answer his questions to the best of my understanding of QM just as long as he or anyone else still has questions.
Now as for you, you still need to think about how to get more people to participate in your forums other than just me, peter griffin, alex claton, new school rebel, truthseeker, red gonzo, yourself, and a few "newest registered members" who never seem to post at all, lol.
madthumbs wrote:
We have life saving information here, and my tolerance for mixing it with this crap is growing thin.
Yet what have you done to effectively alleviate the accelerating globalized Zionist power structure from your reality? Sure, you may have changed a few lives here and there and niche of people by informing them about alternative medicines, etc., etc. But you are not saving them from the intensifying storm that's evolving before their very eyes. Lol, of course, I'm not stopping you from venting off, protesting, creating hundreds of message boards, or even carrying a gun in your material attempts to stop or even hide from this awesome conspiratorial force.
You are turned off by the immaterial implications of QM because you falsely equate it with your unquestioning disdain for "religion". But your expected reaction is also a byproduct of your admitted lack of knowledge on the subject. This is what you wrote in your post here:
madthumbs wrote:
QM is similar to religion, that discussion of it in this context may dissuade people from taking the other content presented seriously, and that it may be putting us in the same category with conspiracy nuts. Why am I afraid to say this? -Because I haven't looked into it far enough...
QM is not a religion. It is a science that implies that matter is an illusion. Because of its implications, religious beliefs do have a scientific basis. It is not religion in itself that is the problem. It is what we have created it to be that is the problem. We have created destructive concepts of God because we ourselves are still destructive in this phase in our evolution.
I would have to say that my statement above makes a cool point. Don't you think so?
I understand that you are worried about the credibility of your forums being hurt at the hand of QM "spam". However, do realize that you (as the site owner) may have already put into question and doubt on the credibility of your own judgment -- as proven by your tendency to pre-judge information which you admit you know little of. The reason I've been making these threads is to provide discussion and related research links for study purposes.
Nothing is being forced on you.
madthumbs wrote:
We have life saving information here, and my tolerance for mixing it with this crap is growing thin.
This "crap" is something you are not in any position to criticize, evaluate, or even vent on about since you already admitted before that you know little to nothing about its subject matter. This "crap" also just so happens to be the most successful scientific endeavor 1, 2 in the history of modern science.
But I guess all the accolades and the long glorious history, reputation of success and high respect get thrown out the window in your controlled forums because in your world, "religion" must always be wrong. What you fail to see is that QM doesn't even support "religion". It only empirically confirms the scientific basis for a non-physical reality and the complete illusion of materialism. But I guess even that is enough for you to brand the whole science as an extension of religious "crap".
Because of these reasons, you appear to be so negatively one-track minded towards "religion" in general so as to cause you to instinctively (subconsciously) deem as spam any science (no matter how respectable that science is) supporting immaterial reality which "religion" also implies. And you would carelessly intuit so without first educating yourself on the science at hand (in the hopes to at least put yourself in a credible position to do so).
You see if you "vented" like this and showed a "growing thin tolerance" for QM in any respectable scientific forum while admitting earlier that you're unfamiliar with the science you would have been banned or punished for being perceived as a troll. It is a good thing you are in your own forums as of now and be able to get away with your "rants".... because there is just no way your "growing thin" condescending conjecture would pass in those scientific communities which you do not control.
The only credible position you could possibly rant about against QM in your forums is if I sold the science in my posts as being "too good to be true". However, that was never the case since not once did I say in these forums that QM was going to be easy to apply. You cannot deny the fact that I have continually emphasized the need for a willing individual to devote his or her lifetime to QM's application in order to experience effective results. I have stated many times in your forums that QM's application is not for the faint of heart. Do you deny this?
Just because QM is so difficult to apply in most people's lives due to societal time restrictions, jobs, family, and social indoctrination and conditioning .... and just because you do not have the time, knowledge base, patience -- and hence, developing skills for it -- doesn't mean it doesn't work. Just because your one-tracked unquestioning disdain for "religion" has caused you to carelessly categorize QM into the same pool of "disinfo" which you think you are well above, does not mean QM doesn't work. I have said many times in here that QM demands the testing of one's own will and forces him or her to come face to face with the very deep question "how far am I willing to go to save my life and the lives of those whom I love ?"
I have said many times how insignificant the Planck's Scale's magnitude is. You may not like QM and its far-reaching demands, but I didn't post the science in your forums to please you. To be able to persist (reference) an intention (an action) from that scale into one's own ordinary macro-scopic everyday experience would require an astronomical amount (quantum) of time. How far are you willing to go to rid yourself from the ever accelerating and evolving global conspiratorial power structure that's encroaching on you and those whom you love (or so you think you love) as you read this? Do you have what it takes?
I have said QM scientifically implicates that anything is possible. I have said it is that simple. I never said it was that easy to do. The choice is your's. But that choice will be tested. It is easy to make the choice, but increasingly difficult and complicated to be able to hold on to that choice. That has always been the theme of my posts regarding the science.
Anyone can do it, but not everyone will.
madthumbs wrote:
One of our member's father's is dying from MS.
And so is my Dad from cancer. However, even if he ends up "dead", I'm willing to maintain my "faith" in established evolving science --> Quantum Mechanics. The purposes of my QM threads / posts are not so much an attempt to make your world a better place by giving you results on demand. The purposes of my QM-threads / posts are to hopefully increase your scientific understanding of the fallacy of matter / materialism / externalized reality so as to exercise the philosophical implications of Self-Evolution, Self-Purpose, and ultimately, Self-Understanding. What you do with that information and how you interprete things is your choice. I'm not forcing you to accept QM or other sciences which may perhaps succeed it.
We know we can only experience reality as electrical signals taking place in our brains (as a sentient experience). This is the central implication of QM. Can you (madthumbs) experience reality outside your experience of it? If you think you can, show me. If you cannot, then the core of QM maintains its credibility and worth. You see countless scientific research finds that the brain rewires / remaps itself via repeated experience. The scientific term for this is Neuro-plasticity.
A positive attitude can get us far, but there is a limit to how far it gets us.
Believing that there is a limit to its potential is the first step in creating that limit. This also explains why not all placebos always work, and most people can't seem do the most bizarre implications of QM. Most people are too hard-wired to change the inertia of their mindset. It's very difficult. That doesn't make it impossible.
madthumbs wrote:
That is what it's doing in REALITY.
You mean your reality. You're experiencing your reality. Until you can demonstrate to me that you can experience something other than yourself, you can only speak for yourself. Of course, you can comeback and say the same for me. However, I'm not contesting that. I'm in fact, acknowledging that very concept. It's called Solipsism.
madthumbs wrote:
If the shit worked: you would have control over my perception and acceptance of it, but do you?
Sure I do. In my frame of reference, I cannot help but consider you to be just an experience in my mind. Can you prove objectively to me that you exist independently of my experience of you? How can you do so, since the very moment I interact with you, I'm still experiencing my mind. This means, in my frame of reference, no matter what "you" do, I'm determining your actions all the time. Even in your frame of reference (although when I say this, I'm still experiencing myself), you run into the same obstacle that I just explained. How do I objectively prove to you that I'm separate from your experience of me?
Not only that, but the implications of Special Relativity say this since Light (c) is a constant in all reference frames. This means that there is actually only one reference frame (an individual's first person reference frame being the "speed" of Light itself). Why is Light a logical constant and is the same in every reference frame? Because Light IS the only reference frame (the first person reference frame which no individual can ever surpass).
peter griffin wrote:
So if I decide to simply stop paying attention to the global conspiracy it will eventually cease to exist? If so, what about all the information I already "know" about it?
It will eventually lose its momentum. The more you pay attention to something else, the more you give that energy. But the scale in which you can see such direct influence with mind is near around the Planck's Scale. So you can get an idea of the amount of energy (persistence) involved in extruding from that scale. This is why even transcendental buddhist monks have spent their whole lives in practice while only a very few of them have managed to generate a few "tulpas" (aka thoughtforms).
peter griffin wrote:
Does this mean that each concept is but a smaller (or larger) version of another concept?
It's Time changing state, giving rise to differing variations of information (thereby giving the illusion of separation and objectivity). But all of these different informations (concepts) are made of the same essence, Time itself. So your first person experience is the only true Time reference frame which you know of and of which perceives reality in resolutions. You experience all resolutions simultaneously, but depending on your moment-um (the persistence of your focus) in Time, you experience some concepts more vividly than others. In your personal experience reference frame, you experience this global conspiracy (which is in itself a matrix of information) more clearly than others (example: your hopes, your dreams, etc.).
peter griffin wrote:
What I mean by that is if a fractal means an exact copy of something at smaller and smaller (or larger and larger) scales to infinity how can a concept be a fractal when each concept is different from the others?
The evolution of Self-Awareness, remember. I'll explain with an effective link below.
There is no such thing as an "exact copy" in Time. There is no exact copy because there is no separation, period. Copying implies a multitude, and therefore separateness. The whole point behind the thread Time & Changes of State is about Time being a curve (it changes directions / states always). That change of state provides an infinite array of variations in momentum. However, despite the infinite possibilities in changes of state, it is still the same thing changing itself over and over again. That thing which we experience as Time is also the only concept that really exists.
That concept is Existence itself. This link provides a very good understanding of the function of the Existence concept and why it is Self-Awareness (Consciousness).
Quote:
Consciousness is another name for existence. Existence is an abstract concept that is true of itself. This condition is necessary and sufficient for a concept to be a conscious being, a thought thinking itself. The only such concepts are existence and our selves, which are existence observing itself in time. Our selves are formed in our brains when we become conscious. They result from brain function, but unlike other concepts that our brains can form, these concepts are themselves conscious. This is why we feel that there is more to consciousness than just brain function.
Time is not linear, but curved. It needs to curve to change state and therefore generate moment-um. Time is your Sentient Consciousness which I'm alluding to here as the Existence concept itself. Being able to refer to itself via state change implicates Self-Awareness. Because it (You) changes state, your purpose is to evolve forever. Which way you decide to evolve is up to your Free-Will. But you are always changing state no matter how much or how minute you experience such changes to be. Every moment you experience is never the same.
Related: A brief understanding of Time within Quantum Mechanics
Quote:
The individual observer is the only true reference frame, because they are creating their own time & space.
We can assume there are other people in their own reference frames (space-times), but we can never experience them outside our own experience of interpreting them having their own.
peter griffin wrote:
Or are you saying that the singular consciousness (for lack of a better term) is broken into fractals, each fractal being a sentient mind at a slightly different frequency, which experiences just one of the infinite amount of experiences?
Yes. it is a singular Sentience in Time (which changes states -- changes moments -- and therefore generates moment-um). The illusion is to think that there are multiple separate sentient minds independent of each other experiencing different frequencies, when in reality, only the present moment changes states -- as it provides the simultaneous experience for all information with varying degrees of resolution.
peter griffin wrote:
So if I, again, cease to focus on the global conspiracy information, which I seem to have nearly exhausted anyway now I just go round and round with details, and focus on something else, the global conspiracy frequency will move out of the range of the average frequency and the new focus will begin to make up the average.
Yes. It's that simple. But it's not a cakewalk. We're talking about the Planck's Scale (~6.63 * 10-34 Js) which is a workable limit estimated by physicists to explain away the mathematics of infinity. The amount of persistence needed to reiterate that scale to the macro everyday world could potentially take a lifetime. An individual would have to sacrifice all other activities in his or her life to undertake such an endeavor. The question is, how much do you want to get out of your current frequency range? Are you willing to pay the ultimate sacrifice to defeat the global conspiracy that you are experiencing in high resolution?
peter griffin wrote:
You also seem to be saying that the new focus can be ANYTHING, perhaps even flying or moving through rock, given enough focus on a specific concept.
Yeah.
peter griffin wrote:
It's funny that you state that, because I've often noted that as I form a certain idea about this conspiracy (or anything really) and focus on it, and form a prediction of the general way things will go, they often go that way. I usually attribute that to mere chance or good study, but perhaps that's not it.
The word prove comes from the word "probability". The more you repeat something, the more you increase its quantum state in your frame of reference. By doing so, you increase its probability wave. There are no coincidences in life. There are only resolutions of experiences, all of which obey the laws of Quantum Mechanics and its probability dynamics.
peter griffin wrote:
Many things are impossible to disprove. That in itself is not proof.
Quantum Mechanics already implicates Solipsism directly. While nothing can be objectively proven (since QM implies a subjective reality), experiential reality cannot be denied. Can you deny experiencing reading this post right now? Like I said before, the concept of Solipsism says that there is no experience outside one's own experience. To be able to discredit such a statement, one must be able to provide objective evidence of the opposite. If such a task is not possible, Solipsism must be true. There seems to be no other way around this.
So again, please show me (without experiencing your own mind) that there is a real experience outside your own mind. If you are unable to meet this challenge, the theory of Solipsism must be true.
peter griffin wrote:
My point was that both of our theories are impossible to prove or disprove.
I definitely respect your stronghold to maintain such a point. But I want you to answer the 2 questions below:
On the theory of Solipsism
1.) Do you acknowledge as a fact that you are experiencing and can only experience life through your own mind?
On the theory of an External Reality
2.) Do you acknowledge as a fact that you can objectively prove the existence of external experiences separate from your experience of attempting prove to it?
peter griffin wrote:
But how? Merkaba meditation? Intense focus on anything? What is the method?
Anything. Just repeat an activity, whatever it is, until you see the results in that direction. It's that simple. Not that easily applied. Your will should be tested to the point when you probably feel like you are to give up. If you choose to give up, then that choice becomes the overlay of your other activities. That subconscious choice would reflect the momentum of your mindset and should indicate to you the state of your willpower.
You must overlay your conditioning to give up with your willingness to persist. Depending on the state of your subconscious conditioning, the level of difficulty could either be extremely difficult or perhaps even a lot easier than I estimate. The amount of persistence = level of difficulty.
peter griffin wrote:
All of this leads me to the question, is there any point in helping others see through the illusion if these others do not actually exist?
Yes. They are direct reflections of yourself. If you help them, it also increases your frequency range from the level in which you do not want to be. You want to build a better reality (level) for yourself correct? In that better reality, you vividly experience the people who share your frequency range. No matter what level you are in, you will only vividly experience the people who reflect the level of your experience.
peter griffin wrote:
Is this constructed reality that is created by me in any way manipulated by another being/entity/person?
No. It changes state according to its momentum in Time. So Time already functions everything for you. Time (changes of state) is a function of the evolutionary purpose of Self-Awareness / Self-Existence. It's just an issue of whether you are willing to choose a different direction (momentum) in this infinite function. While you cannot stop Time, you can manipulate its momentum (its vector) to a frequency of your choice. And when I mean choice, I don't mean that lightly. I mean choice as persistence (the caliber in which demands that you overcome your willingness to give up).
The purpose of evolution is for you to always eventually meet your limits, so that you can step over them. You cannot beat your conditioned limits if at first, they remain hidden and their resolution is low. That's why this global conspiracy is gaining resolution in your experience. The more it becomes exposed, the more advanced information to defeat it becomes available to you.
Learning QM is the easy part and you're probably already familiar on its deep philosophical implications. The real challenge now is applying your mind to a level of persistence that would probably demand your 100% time. Perhaps this is where most "people" will fall short in their decision to do so. To devote one's time into this also implies sacrificing the matrix of your everyday routines and comforts and distractions (examples include time for family, marriage, friends, jobs, vacations, etc.) -- for those are all frequencies in themselves which could serve to get in the way (depending on your intended concept).
How far are you willing to go down the rabbit hole?
You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged.
Are you ready?
peter griffin wrote:
What I mean by that is although my thoughts may be creating reality is there someone/something manipulating my thoughts/how I think so that I create a specific reality to the benefit of the manipulator? If so, is this "person" yet another sentient aspect of the singular mind?
Yes. That "manipulator" aka Time is the central aspect of yourself -- that aspect being the Evolution of Self-Existence / Awareness itself. Time is the only function in the Evolution of Self. Your mind is evolving and it always changes state because of Time. The purpose of your experience in this Time level is for you to evolve from it. You do this by redirecting Time through a persistence of your choice.
Reality is identical with the totality of observed phenomena – footnotes of observer effect
Is that a quote from something? I'd really need quotes like that for something I'm doing at the moment, but can't be bothered to go through loads of scientific documents.
I think most people have stopped posting because there's nothing much left to say. If you can't work out what's going on from what's already about then you haven't got much of a chance. On top of that, most people still don't care.
To add to what you've said totalitariantiptoe, if you've ever had lucid dreams or an out of body experience or anything like that, you'll know that dreams can be as real, if not more 'real' than your waking life. Most people consider dreams to be simply mimicking reality in a way that allows you to vent subconcious problems and as being subordinate to your waking life.
However I think it's more plausible that dreams are analogous to your waking life. If your mind can create settings you've never seen and create dream characters that seem completely real to you, it seems logical to conclude that your waking life abides by the same principles, as the observer effect implies that it must.
Also the world as we know it almost seems almost cheesy, we're ruled in secret by a secret organisation who use eyes and pyramids to identify with one another, like some shitty hollywood film, which makes me think something is seriously odd in the first place, something beyond money and power. 90% of the population are braindead beyond belief and completely resistent and even aggressive towards any change. It seems logical to phase them out and allow yourself to better them (if they exist) as I do not believe that this is the only life I'll experience.
Sun Apr 25, 2010 2:25 pm
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8624 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
Scotchley wrote:
if you've ever had lucid dreams or an out of body experience or anything like that, you'll know that dreams can be as real, if not more 'real' than your waking life. Most people consider dreams to be simply mimicking reality in a way that allows you to vent subconcious problems and as being subordinate to your waking life.
-But I can't catch a venereal disease or end up coerced to pay child support from a dream.
Solipsism seems related to megalomania, narcissism, and psychopathy. Perhaps all these conditions stem from solipsism that endured beyond childhood?
Solipsism: Everything exists only in my mind.
Megalomania: I am a god.
Narcissism: I am so great I might be a god.
Psychopathy: People are objects that I use however I wish.
Solipsism seems related to megalomania, narcissism, and psychopathy. Perhaps all these conditions stem from solipsism that endured beyond childhood?
Solipsism: Everything exists only in my mind.
Megalomania: I am a god.
Narcissism: I am so great I might be a god.
Psychopathy: People are objects that I use however I wish.
An individual can say what he or she wants about Solipsism. Humorous comebacks can only do so much as to flatter a reader who is expected to retain peace of mind through the belief that his or her family and the people in his , her life are "real" people. But the position that Solipsism is real is and always will be 100% logical while the position that it isn't remains 100% illogical. Consider the following:
- It can be stated that you can only experience your mind and it would be impossible for you to logically deny this.
- You can state that there is an "outside" world independent of your mind though it would be impossible for you to logically prove your statement due to the fact that you're always experiencing your mind in the process.
Both statements are interconnected with each other and are not only consistent to, but are the central foundations of Quantum Mechanics + Special Relativity. Both these physics cornerstones (QM + Special Relativity) ultimately point to Solipsism.
Guys Quantum Mechanics could just be a house of cards like the monetary system. Smoke and mirrors if you will. Tesla never agreed with the Quantum mechanics. As you may know Tesla was one of the most incredible people to live and understood mechanics and the sub-mechanical nature of what we call the reality. Most people talk about reality but never build a thing to back it up. If you can't engineer it or make it then you can talk and talk and convince people of nothing.
I think we are giving human Consciousness to much credit as if only one level of consciousness is all there is. I don't remember being a baby aged 1,2 or 3, My first memories are when I was almost 4 going to kinder garden or play school. Does this mean I had no consciousness? or no memory? What if I had no capacity to remember anything. If I can't recall anything and have a conversation would this mean I have no consciousness?
I think questions like Solipsism are hard for modern humans to understand because we are very limited and undeveloped. I think we are simply animals with a few tricks up our DNA, a tinny bit more mental capacity. There is nothing divine about us.
Lastly just because one cannot prove a negative does not mean it must be true. It just means we don't understand and even if somebody did understand I highly doubt they could make anybody else understand in a world jam packed with gatekeepers and institutions and so on.
Its good to talk but we need evidence which is the basis of understanding and reality. Without it we can never make the next step.
