I think I can explain why the list of articles finish in December.
Until he was fired in January 2006 , DBS was broadcasting on Genesis. Back in those days the website only listed the most recent shows. The older shows would drop off as newer shows replaced them at the top. Following this logic at time of removal from genesis the shows from December would be well down the list and possibly mostly removed from the list as there would be January shows occupying the top parts of list.
This was the time when DBS was pushing the envelope towards shining the light on the zionist activities. His dismissal came when he mention the Lubbowitz on air.
As an indepentent broadcaster the website has simply listed all the shows done post Genesis and these were added to the list on website at date of dismissal.
Some earlier shows which had dropped from website due to age were re-instated. I think Ennis interview on USS Liberty would be example here. most of other earlier shows were not added because they were not showing any light on zionist as they covered topics other broadcasters had covered as well. DBS was covering fairly mainstream stuff not to disimilar to what Alex Jones did.
This is my opinion anyway based on listening to the shows since October 2005. this is why there may be fewer Piper interviews because he may not have interviewed him in January and the earlier interviews may have fallen from website due to age. For some reason known to Eric they were not added when some of the older stuff was re-instated.
Posted By: ChristopherBollyn
Date: Sunday, 17 September 2006
A European safety expert and former marine, who has followed closely the brutal arrest and TASERing of 9/11 researcher and journalist Christopher Bollyn at his home in Hoffman Estates, Illinois, on August 15, 2006, has made some interesting observations, some of which I am posting here.
He found my affidavit and statement of fact served to the Hoffman Estates officials, Mr. James H. Norris, Village Manager, and Clinton J. Herdegen, the Chief of Police, on the Internet. Here are some of his comments:
Serving the village manager and C.O.P. with an affidavit was a good idea, he said, hit the local persons in charge and responsible for what their staff is doing when loitering around town, because they are the weakest link in this affaire. They are also in fact responsible, and guilty of mismanagement, incompetence, breaking the law, etc.
These officials should be required to prove their "gang suppression" story as the reason for sending out these armed thugs and prove that these thugs were, in fact, local cops. Three armed civilians in a car? Why not one?
R. Russo [Hoffman Estates P.D. spokesman] suggests the cops identified themselves by showing some badges, etc.
BUT they were heavilyarmed men ("armed to the teeth") dressed like civilians in an unmarked car.
What does a badge mean? he asked. It is easy to fake! I would have run away if such hoodlums arrived.
It is not clear what Chris was actually arrested and TASERed for, he wrote.
Was he provoking the local police? They, of course, will say so, but was he?
It is not even established that at that moment the strangers were cops. They could have been anybody Chris thought they were FBI agents and the latter have no right to do local police work.
Or they could have been Mossad! A very good reason to run. But Chris was stupid and asked who they were. He could have been dead the next second.
Herdegen is in a bad position. Correct action his staff receives a 911 call about a suspicious car with armed men from Chris. The staff could simply have informed that it might be the local gang suppression team loitering around nothing to worry about. But instead the staff informs Chris they will send somebody to check. Not explain!
And then comes to illogical part. Herdegen's staff contacts the gang suppression team to return to Bollyn's place and explain themselves. This was very stupid.
OK let's accept that as a fact. The gang suppression team is informed about a worried citizen at such and such address and they are just in the vicinity. Easy they just return to that address and see Chris on the porch blow the horn do not get out of the car just roll down the window and say, "Hey, Mr. Bollyn, was it you that called 911 about us?
And Mr. Bollyn might say, "Yes I just called 911."
And then the men still in the car would say: "Don't worry about us we belong to the local police but are in civilian clothes as we are just on a gang suppression mission looking around. Have a nice day. Byebye."
No story. Easy.
But this didn't happen. The unmarked car parked at the curb and all three men (!) got out of the car with guns and armor no indication of who they were and marched up the driveway.
That is very provocative, threatening, and unusual. It is also very unprofessional.
Herdegen and Norris are to blame. Lack of training and instruction. This is NOT the way to handle a 911 call. The gang suppression team should have been instructed not to get out of the car. And there was no need to get out of the car or if there were, send in only one man without a gun. Or better yet, wait for an official police car with a uniformed cop to arrive to explain the problem.
Herdegen/Norris are 100% to blame. They should be fired for incompetence. Of course they bureaucrats always blame the innocent bystander. He should have done this and that. He should behave so and so. He should not use bad body language.
Yes we simple bystanders do this and that and behave so and so and we have funny body language. We are in fact stupid which is quite normal! And we get very afraid when armed thugs march up against us. Doesn't the police know this? It is basic! They often misunderstand a friendly gesture and think they will be shot at and shoot you.
But is the gangsuppression story true? Or made up? Then Herdegen/Norris are in even worse trouble. I would not be surprised that they were actually sent to harass the Bollyn family one way or another but that is unproven.
Actually Herdegen/Norris should be sent to jail! The damages are done and they are responsible. No doubt about it.
The police will never say why they were in your neighborhood in the first place (to intimidate you?). So you call the cops about this mysterious car and the cops call their car which is the mysterious one in your area and they arrive at your door. The same car/armed men you were worried about.
I assume Chris asks, "Why are you loitering around my house?"
And because the cops are uneducated slobs in this case (normally used for such jobs to intimidate you) they arrest Chris. They will present some strange charges or drop the case, etc. But they will not say why they were loitering around your place.
An intelligent police person would, of course, have informed Chris that they were staking some other suspect person in the area, thanked Chris for being alert and asked him not to worry and to keep quiet not to disturb the ongoing case. But these people are too stupid for that.
Of course the slobs at your door are just victims of the system. Who told them to check your area in the first place? For what purpose?
Homeland security? Nosey journalist writing unwanted copy? Wife making noise about mysterious sinking of Estonia ferry.
Yes, the armed men at your door believe you are a danger to their world. So be very careful. In the end you have no chance, so better leave the country or move to another town this is what they want in the first place. If you don't leave, they will send in the cavalry. This was just a warning take heed.
It is sad, but because you are up against the 'existing system,' you are in a losing position. The 'system' has big plans to conquer the world and you are in the way. Soon there will be mass arrests of people in U.S. that are against the system. Like NaziGermany 1933/4. Media will adapt as it has already. The silent majority will do nothing.
It is interesting to note that the cause of arrest was 'resisting an arrest'! What arrest? They didn't have any warrant? Who had ordered the arrest? For what? Living in a house? These slobs have IQ 5.
No it could be worse than that. The thugs in the unmarked car were out to kill Chris! Run over him. Shot him down. It seems logical to me! Well known journalist killed in accident police looking for suspects. But the plot was spoiled by Chris calling 911.
So they became upset. You were very lucky. You can be sure the mass media will not mention the incident or quote Chris' article or that the 'police' will issue any explanation or apology...
And if that is the case it is best to leave the country before it is too late. Because it will not get any better.
It is quite clear. The US police has become a political tool ... and they went after Chris. So the police top brass is just a puppet ... ask the top brass who gave the orders, whatever they were to kill or just harass?
Be skeptical. Be very, very skeptical.
The thugs in the unusual car paid by U.S. tax payers are evidently underemployed and must be kept occupied. You became an obvious target. Little else to do for this stupid trash. They just follow orders ... and then lose control when confronted due lack of training.
Not like in France. Luckily there are three police forces here the local one unarmed very friendly and known to everybody that just looks after the neighborhood. Then the national one, armed for more serious work but with whom you can talk. And finally the gendarmerie that is really tough but professional/military used for police duties you do not argue with them. But the latter are tightly controlled not to be used for political aim and you can talk to its boss a political appointee. In U.S. matters seem to have become completely out of control as you are well aware of.
I see on the AFP site that the case will be heard in court on 9/13! Interesting. The thugs on a mission of gang suppression thought that Bollyn had made statements indicating that he was going to go inside the house and get a weapon or may be trying to get a weapon.
Well if gangs were loitering around my house and armed men in body armor, that refuse to identify themselves, inform me about that, I would also go into my house and get a weapon. I am a trained soldier. But I would not tell the armed men of my intentions. Of course in France I have no weapon but in the U.S. it seems to be both legal and encouraged by the Constitution to have a gun in every house to protect yourself against gangs and strange armed people in body armor sneaking around.
Or is Chris part of a gang? To be suppressed? What is gang suppression? What gangs are making Hoffman Estates dangerous? White, black, Hispanic, Islamic, Jewish? There must be simpler ways to suppress gangs than sending a car around with armed men! E.g. first establish the facts! Are there any gangs at Hoffman Estates? Or had the armed men gone the wrong way? Couldn't read a map thought they were in some criminal gang area in Chicago? And where did these gang suppressors come from? What exact instructions had they been given? Did they have any training in 'gang suppression'?
'Gang suppression' has nothing to do with the real concern at stake today. Terrorists of Muslim faith! Gangs are local juveniles with some strange ways. Quite easy to handle by social workers. No undercover agents in body armor needed.
So the statement by the Hoffman Estate police department that undercover agents were on a gang suppression mission seems to be an outrageous lie.
Why do they lie?
Because they were caught with their pants down. Any undercover agent in body armor caught with his pants down is ludicrous. His most private part without any armor being shown. So they panic and start to TASER the surroundings, arrest people without any reason their minds are blanks! and when they wake up they lie.
So much for US law enforcement. But the court will probably be another bad joke. Because you cannot joke with US law enforcement these noble men in their body armor. The best and the brightest. This Bollyn character was just subject to some friendly fire ... this happens (all the time) and has therefore no case, the court will decide.
In retrospect never call the police if you notice something suspect in your neighborhood you will only get hurt. Better lock up your house and take out your gun ... to defend yourself when somebody is intruding on your property. An electric fence around the ground and warning signs help. And dogs. With all these gangs snooping around not being suppressed. And when police arrives (you will never call them in the future you are your own police force) it must be in an easily recognizable car with uniformed agents that clearly identifies themselves by phone. They will then be allowed in for coffee and cakes.
In court you are, in theory, innocent until proven guilty even if the judge and media already regard you as guilty. Everything that the prosecutor proposes must be proven beyond reasonable doubt, etc. So they will make up a fairy tale and line up the thugs now as witnesses and the simple facts will be established. You attacked them in their duty.
Whatever you say will not be regarded as facts because you have no witnesses except the family. So you will lose. No doubt about it.
But a TASER was in fact used! Was Mr. Bollyn warned? Or was there no time to issue a warning? Why not also TASER the wife and child? You never know they might be armed!
You'll never see Lisa Guliani or Lisa Morton or Lisa Taylor respond to the bolded part. That's because she knows Bollyn is right.
We judge those who we dislike by their associations.
Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:23 pm
Joined: 23 Jun 2006 Posts: 820 Location: Australia
i asked questions the first time i listened to 'em.
i keep lots of questions in the back of my mind when reading or listening.
both daryl and eric have done a fantastic job in getting me to think about things i hadn't before,
simplifying complex issues..
they have senses of humour.
and above and beyond the childish sarcastic humour of alex jones and his flock.
and suggetions for action.
and more than just learning and action..
it has sparked in me the ability to think about things i hadn't before,
where i can explore other, including my own personal 'established beliefs'.
Last edited by stOneskull on Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:56 am; edited 1 time in total
His book was published by a company that is part of the Murdoch empire was it not? While this is suspicious, keep in mind that Murdoch is a jew who hangs out and supports other rich jews. If you want to engage in deception, let a little truth come out but no too much. And as Eric said, his book blames NO ONE for 9-11. He just proves it was a controlled demolition. :(
What I have to wonder is how someone who is removed from Rupert Murdoch by only three degrees, hooked up with Chris Bollyn, one of the most anti-zionist, uncontrolled people in the world. Bollyn is dangerous and we all know this. Wingtv sort of were on the right track when they and Piper, who truly believe Danner is a hoax, wondered how Hufschmid hooked up with Bollyn and why. But then again, they aren't totally honest either. Neither wingtv or Piper have totally been.
That's eric's company.
Where you have your information from?
Yes Eric just proves it was controlled demolition
- do you know when the book was published?
it was on 11.9.2002 - at that time and consequent 3 years it was best piece of research.
...let a little truth out?
this is one of the most stupid threads on whole forum, becuase it throws accusations in the air without any evidence
to find out which lie will suceed.
ppl calling on radio claiming eric is behind hologram theory, that eric is behind a3 skywarrior theory,
you post here that your comrade tells you that eric spreads vatican deception
- this is unbelievable, taking in fact that Eric and Daryl WERE THE FIRST who started exposing all of these fraudulent theories.
I am inclined to collect all these lie quotes since there are so many of them and publish them in one single thread.
why is stormfront engaged to spread lies about eric?
painful questions was done in year 2002 when NOBODY did any research about israeli involvement in 911.
(pastore's starnger than fiction appeared afterwards)
The book and video does NOT name ANY group,
it was done to show that official story is wrong,
because it was in 2002.
Well look at what he says.
Piper said that in this or a later broadcast, after research.Explaining the holdings etc.
He means the October 6 one or an earlier broadcast. I will look for this myself or ask this guy for more proof.
(6) When Daryl Bradford Smith and Piper discuss the attack on the U.S.S. Liberty, they say LBJ was going to launch a nuclear strike on Egypt as retaliation. Nothing could be further from the truth. Doing such would have caused an immediate Soviet response, not just on Israel but perhaps on the United States itself. Piper says LBJ also called back the planes on the way to the site of the Liberty attack, but he didn't. It was an admiral that called off the F4s. This is covered in a later broadcast.
(7) When "Mike" calls in, he says that the Israeli jets and planes that attacked the Liberty were not marked. If that's true, then how would the crew on the Liberty know they were Israelis attacking them? He goes on to claim that one Israeli soldier saw the flag and asked for clarification on attacking an American ship and was told to go ahead and attack an American ship. There is not a shred of evidence to suggest this is true.
(8) Michael Collins Piper says that a bunch of Israeli art students celebrating the 9/11 attacks and claims that a "Jewish newspaper out of New York" affirmed that they were Mossad agents. But he doesn't give the name of the newspaper. Why not? Could it be because he's making it up?
Okay we know number seven is bullshit. An Israeli pilot recently admitted that he was told to attack even though headquarters knew it was an American ship.
What do we say to number six? What do we say about number eight? What is this paper? Was it named? It doesn't matter because Bollyn's work has uncovered that Urban Systems was a Mossad front.