I was chatting with a friend a few days ago about the Chrysler thing and etc. He calls it one of the biggest Scams of the Century. He told me the World Mafia Money Cartel (as he likes to call them) have plans for us. They figure the third world is good enough for them, it should be good enough for us. Is that the plan for the future? When one thinks about all the closures, out-sourcing and down-sizing, how can we not wonder if this is true or not? I think it is true that those who control the money can control everything else. I don't know how many times I've been told its not the GovernMints, but the Rothschild / Bauer Family -> stupid and has been ever since their - FRACTIONAL RESERVE BANKING SYSTEM. I'm far from an economist and just digging into all this is daunting. I've read tons of info on economics and the bankers, federal reserve systems and etc. I'm thinking its all about "control" regardless of money. Try and tell someone that some family and their willing partners want to control the World and you'll be laughed out town by sunset. So, if this is true are we not really trying to understand something that is crazy? If true is it not due to insanity? So how does one understand or explain that to people? On the other hand, could a family of bankers get control of the World's money supply? A good many of us have read all the stories on how these people are supposedly responsible for every war for the last 200 years or so and much, much more grief. If a World Mafia Money Cartel is controlling us, they must have something in common, something more than just greed. Something strong enough to tie them together and keep most of their business private. It has to be a plan and not a very nice one. I do believe elections are a joke and not much, if anything ever changes. It does appear that the World is indeed run by some cartel above the GovernMints. Is it that they are forced to go along with some "plan" or are they just willing to play along? If there is a plan to 3rd World the World as I have heard, this is indeed an insane plan. So, I guess there is some insane plan by money controllers or it is all nonsense.
--
"A super-state controlled by international bankers and international
Industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure"
So how does one understand or explain that to people?
It is easiest when they *want* to know. It is getting them to want to know that is the hard part. Due to a constant barrage of misdirection from the media, people tend to not want to know. They are satisfied with the little they do know, which tends to be half-truths or complete lies. They will want to be endlessly entertained instead of searching for the truth or being subjected to it.
How do we get them to want to know? There may be multiple methods, but I will describe the method I am working on. (It is good to understand some human psychology to help achieve this goal.) First, you must understand that feelings and ideas are spread exactly like infections. (Perhaps the word infection carries the wrong connotation, but it describes the mechanism correctly.) Therefore, the shortest and simplest answer is to expose them to the truth. Once they are exposed to the truth, it will cause a battle with the lies inside them. Continue to expose them to further truths to help them win the battle. After they accept the truth they will tend to infect others around them. It spreads like ripples in a pond, over time, to become an epidemic. It is the battle between good and evil. Good is the truth that unlocks your potential and frees you...Evil are the forces that use illusion and deception to trick you into being ignorant of your potential and imprisons you with invisible bars.
Note that you must be careful to avoid exposing them to false truths. It is very difficult to acquire an irrefutable truth when you are starting this late in the game. The real history revisionists, who have been at this game for a long time now, are the ones that are destroying these irrefutable truths. Anyone that refutes the half-truths or lies created by the history revisionists are called history revisionists themselves, and are attacked with a campaign of slander to discredit them before they can infect more people with the truth. (I call these people history correctionists, to give a better description of what they are trying to do.) To an ignorant observer, it becomes like watching a battle between a protagonist and an imposter, where both are calling each other the imposter. The ignorant observer will not be able to determine which one is the protagonist since he was not paying attention in the beginning. In his confusion, he will be powerless, unable to make a decision, and therefore cannot lend assistance. And here you can see one of the agendas of Evil: the masses must be kept ignorant and confused to prevent them from joining the fight.
Here is an example of the true history revisonists in action:
After years of government stonewalling in providing answers to basic questions about the fraudulent origin and illegal enforcement of the income tax system, another layer of the tax fraud has now been uncovered: the systemic removal of key legal and historical documents from the National Archives related to the meaning of “income” within the 1916 Income Tax Act, which was adopted by the political branches following the ratification of the 16th (Income Tax) Amendment in 1913, and the Supreme Court’s 1916 interpretation of “Income” within the meaning of the 16th Amendment.
I don't know if anyone is following what the We The People Foundation are doing, but I recommend reading it.
Note that you must be careful to avoid exposing them to false truths. It is very difficult to acquire an irrefutable truth when you are starting this late in the game. The real history revisionists, who have been at this game for a long time now, are the ones that are destroying these irrefutable truths. Anyone that refutes the half-truths or lies created by the history revisionists are called history revisionists themselves, and are attacked with a campaign of slander to discredit them before they can infect more people with the truth. (I call these people history correctionists, to give a better description of what they are trying to do.) To an ignorant observer, it becomes like watching a battle between a protagonist and an imposter, where both are calling each other the imposter. The ignorant observer will not be able to determine which one is the protagonist since he was not paying attention in the beginning. In his confusion, he will be powerless, unable to make a decision, and therefore cannot lend assistance. And here you can see one of the agendas of Evil: the masses must be kept ignorant and confused to prevent them from joining the fight.
Yes, it does help when they want to know. It is hard to get a truth through when it sounds so crazy or they don't want to know. people say that they need to "wake the people up," but they are not sleeping, they are hoodwinked or usurped by the TV programming machine - daily, nightly or both. Most people see the the TV as the eye (deliver) of ultimate truth. They are more excited about who had who last night in Hollyweird, then anything real. They don't care about some mega-money press in a basement and etc. I agree and a good explanation - (Imposter / protagonist.) Infecting people with (truthful) information to tangle with is a good idea. If it can be direct enough or say short, interesting and affective enough. They're not going to ponder on something that is to complicated. What is needed is really effective short versions and hopefully they'll come back and ask for more. After all, who is going to think about something they can't even remember? I understand your point when it comes to being "truthfully" accurate. Throwing nonsense around helps no one. Where to start with someone is also important. Thanks for the info.
I agree and a good explanation - (Imposter / protagonist.) Infecting people with (truthful) information to tangle with is a good idea. If it can be direct enough or say short, interesting and affective enough. They're not going to ponder on something that is to complicated. What is needed is really effective short versions and hopefully they'll come back and ask for more. After all, who is going to think about something they can't even remember? I understand your point when it comes to being "truthfully" accurate. Throwing nonsense around helps no one. Where to start with someone is also important. Thanks for the info.