Cars along FDR drive were randomly toasted. These cars are at least 1/2 mile away from the WTC.
Note the waviness of the tire tracks. What happened?
Did one car run under the other during the event or were they stacked after the event?
The marks in the pavement suggest they were pushed to the side of the road.
What was this thing across the street? Was it a car? Was it a van?
What caused that line of burn marks on the hood of the car in the foreground on the right?
In the left foreground, the remains of a vehicle sit atop a white sedan.
Are we looking at the front or the back end?
It looks like the front end and if it is, its engine is missing.
We can see daylight through the wheel well.
Why would the front of this fire truck wilt?
The front half of car 2723 is toasted, but check out the new wax job on the back.
Notice the missing front door handle and the untouched back door handle.
Does This Look Like a "Collapse"?
Dr Judy Wood, former Professor of Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University,
files official Request for Correction (RFC) with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
citing fraud and deception in the 9/11 NIST Report.
Dr Wood is represented by attorney Jerry Leaphart.
See her website for her paper co-written with Dr Morgan Reynolds entitled
"Star Wars Directed-Energy Weapons (DEW)":
They show clear evidence that the World Trade Center was destroyed by a Directed Energy Weapon (DEW).
Download Dr Wood's latest radio interview (May 2, 2007) where she details her latest research
"DEW Sponsors and Department of Defense Contractors":
Read through the RFC information in the "news" section and learn that NIST contracted with
Applied Research Associates (ARA) for the 9/11 NIST report.
Not only is ARA a manufacturer of directed-energy weapon technology,
but are also a founding sponsor of Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).
DEPS, founded in 1999, put out their first newsletter one year before 9/11.
An excerpt from this newsletter is as follows:
"Lasers in space, lasers in the stratosphere, lasers
on and over the battlefield - we're at the
beginning of an evolutionary new wave of
Judy Wood at Cooper Union, NYC
September 10, 2006
Judy Wood speaking at the forum 9/11 Search for Truth in Seattle
October 28, 2006
Joined: 26 Mar 2006 Posts: 707 Location: Toronto,Canada (biggest Canadian city)
Like all office buildings, the WTC towers contained a huge volume of air. As they pancaked, all that air--along with the concrete and other debris pulverized by the force of the collapse--was ejected with enormous energy. "When you have a significant portion of a floor collapsing, it's going to shoot air and concrete dust out the window," NIST lead investigator Shyam Sunder tells PM. Those clouds of dust may create the impression of a controlled demolition, Sunder adds, "but it is the floor pancaking that leads to that perception."
COOPER: OK, lets look at some of these other myths, and the reality. The other myth, as the towers fell, visible clouds of dust were ejected. Some believe the clouds of dust weren't from the collapse, they were caused by explosions. You say in the magazine the reality is, as each floor collapsed, the contents were pulverized and ejected creating the clouds. How so?
MEIGS: That's absolutely right. When a building collapses, it's like a giant accordion, it's mostly air. So, as it comes down toward the ground, all the air has to be ejected. There's an enormous pressure. You know, people talking about, oh, there must have been bombs in the building. They don't recognize the incredible energy stored up in a 110-story office tower. As that concrete and steel came down, the impact and pressure was absolutely enormous. It ejected huge volumes of air. In some cases, actually, several floors below the collapsing floors. And you can see that on the videos, it does look like something you've never seen before. None of us have ever seen a 100-story building fall down before. And the fact is, this is how it happened.