Reynolds Makes a Federal Case of 9/11 —
Sues NIST Contractors for 9/11 Plane Fraud
Morgan Reynolds
August 21, 2007
Summary:
Last month, the U.S. District Court, Southern New York, unsealed a 9/11 case filed by Dr. Morgan Reynolds, thereby making the case public. Reynolds is suing on behalf of the United States of America after the U. S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York who represents "the government" declined to intervene in the case. The suit, a so-called qui tam case, alleges that the 9/11 contractors NIST hired to investigate destruction of the WTC Towers on 9/11 defrauded the U.S. government of substantial money by rendering bogus, impossible physical analysis and animations about how two hollow aluminum aircraft (allegedly Boeing 767s) flew into a steel/concrete tower and disappeared. Yet it can be easily demonstrated, after a great deal of hard work by dedicated 9/11 researchers, that no planes hit the towers. The office of Reynolds' attorney, Jerry V. Leaphart of Connecticut, is now serving(notifying) the defendants in the suit, including Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), Applied Research Associates (ARA), Boeing, American Airlines, United Airlines and Silverstein Properties. I will post new information on the case as developments warrant.
I've looked a bit into the no plane theory and all I saw was nonsense, hence the code tags.
You shouldn't let your personal views discourage others from looking into it. People should look at information for themselves instead of believing what others say. You should put the links back the way I posted it and encourage people to think for themselves.
Tue Aug 28, 2007 9:48 pm
Sponsor
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8244 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
By all means, look into it if you have the time, but until someone furnishes some good evidence for us, the links aren't allowed. Arguing about personal views is just a waste of time. Furnish some evidence.
Dr Morgan Reynolds has much evidence in his Request for Correction to NIST:
Code:
http://nomoregames.net/911/070308_MR_RFC.pdf
Also, we must note that the unsealed court case has merit. If it didn't, the court would have dismissed it as frivolous. Instead, they unsealed it and Jerry Leaphart is now notifying the Defendants.
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8244 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
Sorry if you feel I wasted your time. I made a decision quite a while ago after getting some outstanding core members to not encourage people to post/ join simply to keep up the density of quality information. I'm not going to watch a full length documentary again on this, or scan a huge pdf. If there's something specific, I'll look at it. I prefer a high reader to poster ratio here, and am almost convinced the no plane theory is nonsense, but I am open to address specifics and not shut it out entirely. Your account is still active if you'd like to copy the bb code from your posts to another forum with looser moderation such as Liberty Forum, or Conspiracy Central.
I mean you no disrespect, and wish you well.
I was a Christian once, so I can't really knock anyone for their beliefs.
