It's been five years since anthrax killed innocents and fueled America's paranoia. Can we finally incarcerate the obvious suspect?
It was five years ago this month that the United States descended into the chaos of September 11. Sadly, even now it's hard to imagine a time when our nation was neither afraid nor vengeful; for better or worse, those events continue to shape and mold our world, and they are still on the forefront of many American minds.
Strange, however, that the anthrax scare that piggybacked on 9/11 has all but disappeared from earnest debate and discussion. Where is the flowery prose commemorating the victims of that tragedy? Where is media coverage highlighting half a decade of biowarfare fears? After all, never have four small envelopes wreaked so much havoc on a country; Capitol Hill underwent voluntary castration when spineless representatives refused to return to their offices, clean-up costs for suspected contamination passed the billion-dollar mark and sales of Cipro were almost as spectacular as those for duct tape and plastic sheeting.
Anthrax remains a big story, one worthy of continued investigation. The tainted letters were addressed to senators, members of the media and average citizens, killed five, injured 17 and turned an already inefficient postal system into a large-scale security nightmare. They also childishly implicated Arabs ("Death to Israel, Allah is Great?" Please.) precisely at a time when American rage towards the Middle East was reaching a boiling point. That alone served as a deciding factor for many Americans to take war abroad, yet despite being an attack on American soil, the Federal Bureau of Investigation repeatedly drags its feet on the issue.
Why? Because they know who stole the anthrax and choose to protect the culprit.
Joined: 08 Jan 2007 Posts: 9 Location: Richardson, Texas
Heh, I thought this was a thread about the band. Guess I was wrong.
Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:10 pm
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8599 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
Mar 11, 2007 8:34 pm US/Eastern
Tables Turned In Anthrax Investigation
'Person Of Interest' Files Lawsuit Against FBI
(CBS News) Remember the anthrax scare? It was about four weeks after 9/11. Letters laced with powdery spores of the deadly bacteria were mailed through the U.S. postal system. In all, five people died, 17 fell ill. At first, everyone thought this was another al Qaeda terrorist attack.
But soon the FBI began keying on a so-called "person of interest" – Steven Hatfill – and launched one of the largest criminal investigations in its history.
As correspondent Lesley Stahl reports, the FBI has been going after this guy for five years, and yet he has got them in court: Hatfill has sued the FBI and Department of Justice for what he claims has been a campaign of leaking lies and distortions about him to the press.
Through the lawsuit, Hatfill’s lawyer has not only obtained boxfuls of internal government documents, but he has also deposed nearly every major law enforcement official involved in the case. It is the latest twist in the FBI's yet unsolved investigation of the anthrax murders.
A number of anthrax letters began appearing in the mail between late September and October, 2001. The letters were sent to news outlets – Dan Rather and Tom Brokaw got them. As did two U.S. senators. And two postal workers, who handled the poisonous envelopes, died.
Steven Hatfill, a medical doctor and an expert on viruses, was outed in a drumbeat of news reports that included aerial shots of the FBI seizing property from his apartment, including his trash.
And then-Attorney General John Ashcroft confirmed on television that Hatfill was a "person of interest."
But instead of the FBI nailing Hatfill, he filed his lawsuit claiming that with their leaks, the FBI and Justice Department had violated his presumption of innocence and destroyed his reputation.
"I object to an investigation characterized, as this one has been, by outrageous official statements, calculated leaks to the media, and causing a feeding frenzy operating to my great prejudice," he said in August, 2002.
In the lawsuit, Hatfill is turning the tables on the FBI: the hunted is dragging the hunters into court. Top officials were deposed on videotape, like John Ashcroft, who was less than forthcoming.
"Is it appropriate for Department of Justice officials to suggest that Dr. Hatfill fits a behavioral profile of the anthrax killer?" Ashcroft was asked.
"I don’t know," the attorney general replied.
"You don’t know whether it was appropriate or inappropriate to disclose that kind of information?" he was asked.
"I don’t know," Ashcroft responded.
Asked if he thought it was fair to Dr. Hatfill, Ashcroft said, "I don't know."
John Ashcroft answered "I don’t know" to 85 questions in the four and a half hour deposition.
Long before the attacks even occured though, the Jewish scientist was already part of an elaborate attempt to setup Dr. Ayaad Assaad (who is of Arab descent). It's not a coincidence at all that Zack and his "Camel Club" shared a history of Anti-Arab racism. That fact alone, gains even more significance, especially when it is tied into what was to culminate: the War on "Terrorism"; a global campaign that involves the persistent racial profiling against Arabs in general. Furthermore, the fact that Zack was not officially incriminated in the early 90's even though he should be considered as the primary suspect behind the missing pathogens (27 in total including Anthrax) taken from the USAMRIID lab in Ft. Detrick, really shows the magnitude of the subterfuge in which the media, the FBI, and the military are involved in.
That being said, it really doesn't come as a suprise that the Zionist controlled media won't honestly report on the Anthrax issue. The media collaborates with the OSI (Office for Strategic Influence), which is a government propaganda branch intended to manipulate public opinion for the purposes of generating pro-Israel / pro-War on "Terrorism" sentiments.
Wed Mar 14, 2007 1:11 pm
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8599 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
2001 Anthrax attack on US Congress made by scientists and covered up by FBI, expert says
Although only a "handful" of scientists had the ability to perpetrate the crime, the culprit among them may never be identified as the FBI ordered the destruction of the anthrax culture collection at Ames, IA., from which the Ft. Detrick lab got its pathogens, the authority said.
Dr Zack took advantage of the fact that 9/11 was being blamed on Arabs to carry out this litte frame-up. I thought Mossad were behind this at one point but realize it was just Dr Zack's individual act of terrorism.
It shows how much society is controlled by Zionists. Known criminals like Zack don't get prosecuted.
If you're a Jew and commit a crime, one that 'everyone' knows about i.e. is common knowledge, you get a free pass.
The conclusion: society is criminal. Authorities are criminal. Government is criminal. America is criminal.
Kinda surprised no one has linked to Robert Pate's investigation into this matter. There is no evidence that has linked Dr. Hatfield in this attack. Again we see Israel behind the scenes. I really doubt Dr. Zack alone could have pulled off something like this. I think we need to seriously drop this lone gunmen theory. At the minimum he would have required assistance from the members of the "Camel Club".
So what other suspects remain? Our best-known suspect or “person of interest” is Dr. Steven J. Hatfill. But after an extensive investigation by the FBI, no physical evidence connects Hatfill with the mailings. Other possible suspects can be dismissed as easily as they are mentioned. Iraq and al-Qaeda are not responsible, even though some within the Bush administration and the news media would like to blame them. There have been suggestions the CIA could have sent the anthrax letters, if a hidden bio-weapons program existed within the agency. But what purpose would such an attack serve? It is hard to imagine a motive for the CIA to commit such an act. Were neo-Nazis, anti-abortionists, or right-wing militias the culprits? There are plenty of off-the-wall theories about possible suspects — even one involving a pagan cult in the Midwest — but nothing has panned out. There is, however, another possibility that needs to be considered.
“Who had the means, the motive, and the opportunity to have brought about these attacks?” is a basic question that needs to be asked.
An extensive and well-developed biological warfare program exists within Israel today. A motive for the anthrax attacks could be to blame Arab terrorists or a 'rogue nation' for this atrocity and to help launch the United States into war against Israel's enemies. Lastly, Israel had prior knowledge of the planned attacks on September 11.
LOL! Thought it was about the band...too funny. "I'm the man! I'm the man!" good memories.
Good question though. I think Anthrax is happy hanging out in soil and in laboratories around the world. From what I understand, if you have the right credentials or license, any number of pathogens, bacteria and viruses can be purchased from certain laboratories.
Someone had to have obtained it from a lab just for more "shock treatment" and talked the stupid sheeple into buying duct tape and plastic sheeting. Red Green even experienced a duct tape shortage. lol (Red Green is a cheesy Canadian comedy TV show)
Anthrax did its job and has no further use in my opinion.
Joined: 15 Jul 2006 Posts: 445 Location: melbourne, Australia
I was speaking to my parents the other night (they are beekeepers) and dad happened to mention that a virus from Israel is behind the weird bee shortages that have been happening in the states and other countries. Made me wonder if this was intentionally released to cause more mayhem because if bees are destroyed, there goes a lot of crops leading to famines.
The virus is called Israeli acute paralysis virus strain and more info can be found about it here:
· The anthrax attacks were concurrent with the debate of Bush’s Patriot Act by Congress and the media.
· The Senators who received anthrax letters were trying to amend the Patriot Act to protect civil liberties and the innocent.
· Two Senate democratic leaders received anthrax letters mailed the same day that Senator Feingold blocked an attempt to rush the bill through without discussion or amendments.
· And on that very same day, the FBI told the Iowa state lab to
destroy the original batch of the Ames strain, making tracing the
anthrax type more difficult.
· Senator Leahy received an anthrax threat after he expressed reservations about the Bill. As Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, he managed the debate on the Bill.
· Senate Majority Leader Daschle received the first Senate anthrax letter as he led the opposition to the original version of the Bill.
· After receiving the anthrax letter, Daschle switched from supporting a 2 year limit on the Bill, later defending a 4-year sunset clause as the “appropriate balance.”
· No Republican received an anthrax letter.
· The House and Senate buildings were closed and not reopened until after the Patriot Act was passed.
· The Supreme Court was shut down with an anthrax scare the day after the constitutionally-challenged Patriot Act was signed by President Bush.
· All the contaminated letters contained the Ames strain of anthrax, the DNA of which is traced to the original batch preserved in a university lab in Ames, Iowa. This strain was “weaponized” in Utah into a potent powder with an elaborate secret technique developed at Fort Detrick, Md.
· The FBI failed to interview Ft. Detrick anthrax experts for two months into their investigation, doing it only after the experts complained to the press of gross incompetence on the part of the FBI.
· The FBI overruled local homicide detectives who think that an anthrax expert was murdered, possibly because he knew too much.
If you find a so called average person and try and explain the Anthrax was an inside job they will look at you like a wack job, I am so impressed with the propaganda media coverage, they have done such a good job at programming lies as truths and making people feel good about what they think they know.
I never tell people about what is really going on, at times I feel like Donald Sutherland in the classic film, Invasion of the Body Snatchers
The Washington government says one of its own high level employees perpetrated the deadly bio-attacks of September 2001, and just committed suicide. So just how much violent extremism is there inside that rotting institution? And when will media outlets begin to question the Federal Government the way they questioned the much less violent militia movement?