You may or may not know who Dr Deagle is but he has some interesting theories and information that seems to make sense, I can't confirm everything but I actually just like his attitude.
He is very obscure and yet the wee baldy guy called Eric Hufi tried to say he is a agent of the nwo?
I personally think he is full of shyte so that is why this thread ended up here. UFO's and paranoia go hand in hand in talk radio.
Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:14 pm
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8187 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
On that note Ed, I remember mentioning something about William Cooper concerning this before, and someone elsewhere informed me that he renounced the ufo stuff before he died, and brought out how he was fed the nonsense.
I believe this the vid you are talking about shadow.
I think Bill Cooper seemed genuine despite being a Christian. Deagle just seems like the Canadian Dr. Alex Jones to me. He seems to love to hear himself talk and doesn't let others talk much like Alex Jones and Rense. There is a pattern to the madness.
I think Bill Cooper seemed genuine despite being a Christian. .
I liked Billy Cooper, he seemed very genuine to me and to me him being a Christian is just his way of expressing his spirituality, I don't have a problem with that, anything that works for you is fine by me.
I can't say I looked into Deagle but he is talking about a lot of different subjects in one go, I find that interesting and he reminds me of a guy I know or knew, very smart, but a bit of a cake hole on a personal level.
I see a lot of these public conspiracy guys as trying to have the biggest, brightest theories, just to suck up as many people as possible.
I don't know if there are Greys here dealing with governments but I don't think that is the case.
The only difference is I have actually observed artificial non-man made objects in the sky for sure in three instances in my life, once in October 1997 in Pakistan, the lights went out in the village and a huge greenish ball zoomed over our heads across the horizon, it only lasted for 1 second and hundreds of people saw it just bolt away into the sky.
That is one thing but to say these phenomena are Aliens who are in league with the Illuminati is another thing all together, tdon't go there because I have no proof to say such a thing, but to say there are no UFO or USO is not logical considering the number of sighting and the disclosure projects 400 witnesses its hard to say its all a hoax, but that is just me right now.
Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:58 am
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8187 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
I forgot about him being Christian, and that is more important of an issue than UFOs whether he's genuine or not. People in general will reflect those they look up to.
Whether there is extraterrestrial visitors here or not isn't anything I'm going to make up my mind on. Mixing it with important issues would make us whack-jobs by association, and is an endless or pointless debate.
There are new species and life forms constantly being discovered. It's not inconceivable that another human-like life form is yet to be discovered, and it doesn't have to be extraterrestrial. Many people even in the archeology field don't know that other Bi-pedal primates are among us.
Many people even in the archeology field don't know that other Bi-pedal primates are among us.
Don't go all Yeti on me just yet
Remember the Coke Tab advert using the most famous footage of BF, I think with the amount of raping and deforestation we do any humanoid species would have been discovered by now.
I believe its possible we have more undiscovered species than ones we know about when it comes to small creates and sea life which is extensive and with massive diversity.
Do you know about the Drake Equation? It was based on the work done by Frank Drake in 1960 but people attribute it to carl Sagan because he repeated it many times in lectures, it goes something like this.
N = R* fp ne fl fi fc L
* N = The number of communicative civilizations
* R* = The rate of formation of suitable stars (stars such as our Sun)
* fp = The fraction of those stars with planets.
* ne = The number of Earth-like worlds per planetary system
* fl = The fraction of those Earth-like planets where life actually develops
* fi = The fraction of life sites where intelligence develops
* fc = The fraction of communicative planets (those on which electromagnetic communications technology develops)
* L = The "lifetime" of communicating civilizations
Frank Drake's own current solution to the Drake Equation estimates 10,000 communicative civilizations in the Milky Way.
Now you have to take that with big Everest lump of salt because he was only talking about our Milkyway which is small and unspectacular compared to the Trillions of other Galaxies out there that we can detect so far.
Its beyond logic and reason to believe we are the only buggers in this reality.
