American's are programmed to think of Charles Manson as a sinister cult leader. When pictured in magazines or television programs, we see a man with wild hair, dark penetrating eyes, and a swastika etched in blood on his forehead. This image usually pops up on our television screens when the narrator of the story wishes to portray an evil stereotype such as serial killers, doomsday cult leaders or fanatics in general.
It's been over 30 years since Manson's so-called "family" forced their way into the home of famed Hollywood film maker Roman Polanski and his wife, actress Sharon Tate.
People old enough to remember the story know that four young women and one man who lived with Manson on an abandoned movie set in Death Valley, entered Polanski's Los Angeles home on Aug. 8, 1969 and committed five gruesome murders.
Polanski was in Europe for a film shoot and survived the assault. Tate, who was eight-months pregnant, died of multiple stab wounds to the chest and back. The other guests were found shot, stabbed and clubbed multiple times. It was a bloody crime scene and the story shocked the nation. Tait and one of her guests were found hanging by ropes around their neck. A forensic report said they did not die from the hanging.
A few days after the Tate murders, the killers struck again, this time at the home of Leno and Rosemary LaBianca in the Los Feliz section of Los Angeles. The couple was also found stabbed to death multiple times. A knife and fork were left protruding from Leno LaBianca's stomach.
Manson and five of his "followers," Charles "Tex" Watson, Patricia Krenwinkel, Susan Atkins, Linda Kasabian and Leslie Van Houten were convicted by a jury in 1970 on multiple counts of murder.
What is extraordinary about the case is that Manson was not present during any of the murders. The district attorney, 35-year-old Vincent T. Bugliosi, argued that Manson had created a religious cult and was controlling the minds of the family members around him. Bugliosi charged that Manson ordered the killings because he wanted to start a race war. It was a wild story and totally based on circumstantial evidence. There never has been any proof that Manson's little hippie colony in the desert was involved in any kind religious practice. They were merely a group of social misfits and dropouts. Because of his dynamic personality, Manson played the role of the leader, but no one has ever proven the others worshipped him.
Before the trial began, the Manson case became a political issue. President Richard M. Nixon condemned Manson on public television, calling him a dangerous cult leader.
The case by this time was drawing national attention and there was the usual media frenzy. By the time the trial started, nearly everyone in the country knew the story and heard Nixon's public allegations. The chances of a fair trial were almost nil.
The trial was a circus. Manson decided to defend himself. He was assisted by attorney Irving Kanarek, an older lawyer, and Ronald Hughes, a "hippie lawyer" who was officially representing Van Houten. Manson showed up on the opening day with a bloody cross slashed across his forehead. During the trial he got into an argument with Superior Court Judge Charles Older and said "somebody should cut your head off." Paul Fitzgerald, lawyer for Krenwinkel, spent more time defending Manson than his own client. And Manson's lawyer, Irving Kanarek, rambled on for days in a final statement. It ended when Manson to asked him to sit down.
When the prosecution rested and it was time for the defense to present its case, the lawyers stunned the court when they announced that the defense also rested. At that moment three of the women stood up and shouted that they wanted to testify. They said they committed the murders on their own and that Manson had nothing to do with it. One writer described their testimony as a "thin Manson ploy."
Hughes, Van Houten's lawyer, objected to the testimony. A few days later, Hughes disappeared and another lawyer had to be appointed to take his place. After the trial was over, Hughes' body was found wedged among some rocks in a remote rural area. It was rumored that the Manson family murdered him.
Even though he maintained his innocence, a jury found Manson guilty of ordering the Tait-LaBianca killings.
Manson and the others were sentenced to death. The sentence later was commuted to life when California laws were changed. At a later date, Manson and four other men, Robert Beausoleil, Charles Watson, Bruce Davis and Steve Grogan, were tried and convicted for the murders of Gary Hinman and Donald Shea. These two men were killed at separate times and in separate places. Again, Manson denies involvement in these murders.
Manson, now in his sixties, still remains behind bars. He lives in maximum security at California State Prison, Corcoran, California.
Because of the publicity surrounding the case, and the public sentiment that still prevails, nobody expects Manson to ever be released.
It is an odd twist to this story that Charles Manson seems to be where he wants to be. He has rarely known any other life style than the strictly disciplined and confining world of a prisoner. He has been quoted over and over again as saying he has no interest in being set free. That seems to be because Manson doesn't know how to live in the fast-paced, dog-eat-dog society that exists outside of the prison walls.
The political tragedy of the Manson story was that he was turned into a national symbol of the hippie environmental movement. That amazing campaign among young America to save the environment was stopped cold in its tracks, largely because of the Manson case. The story was used by the slick national propaganda machine representing big business interests and magnified into much more than it was. Because the murders were committed by hippie types and involved famous Hollywood personalities, the story was skillfully used to generate public sentiment against the hippies and the environmental movement before it cost big industry a lot of money.
Thus when Charles Manson fell, he brought the entire hippie movement down with him. That date, Aug. 8, 1969, was a black milestone in world history. Since then, we have been obsessed with a new chemical industrial revolution, the world has been rushing wildly into overpopulation, and the destruction of the planet's ecology has been devastating.
Anyone who doubts my words only needs to look at the dying life in our oceans, the destruction of our forests, the strange shifts in world weather patterns, and the ugly brown chemical haze that hangs over our landscape.
Because the last-ditch effort to save the planet was stopped, the world now stands condemned. Our planet is now dead and a record six billion people are struggling to stay alive on its corpse. We are already fighting over what is left of our natural resources. The excessive heat and violent storms looming this summer will only be the beginning of the planet's judgment against the human race. The air and water are polluted. Soon food will be in critically short supply. We will be very lucky if any of us are still around in another 10 years.
Richard Nixon's public condemnation of Manson was an evil act. When the final chapter is written, I believe the world will understand that no national leader, even Hitler, has done anything more despicable. By saying what he said, he helped turn the nation against not only Manson, but against the critically important ecology movement. He denied a man the right to a fair trial before an impartial jury. He denied the human race the chance to get itself under control and turn the world green again.
Yet to this day, Charles Manson is portrayed as the most dangerous person alive. Nothing could be farther from the truth. He's not a saint, but Charles Manson has not been shown to be a killer either.
Manson once explained his perspective of the world. In a lengthy public statement to the court, on the day of his sentencing, he said:
"I never went to school, so I never growed up in the respect to learn to read and write so good. So I have stayed in jail and I have stayed stupid. I have stayed a child while I have watched your world grow up. And then I look at the things that you do and I don't understand.
"I don't understand the courts, and I don't understand a lot of things that are brought against me. You invent stories, and everybody thinks what they do, and then they project it from the witness stand on the defendant as if that is what he did. . .
"I don't think like you people. . . I know that the only person I can judge is me. I judge what I have done and I judge what I do and I live with myself every day. I am content with myself.
"If you put me in the penitentiary, that means nothing because you kicked me out of the last one. I didn't ask to get released. I liked it in there because I like myself. I like being with myself. In your world it's hard because your understanding and your values are different."
Indeed.
Return To Main Page
All written material on this site is copyright protected. Reproduction on other sites is permitted if proper credit is given and the material is not sold or used for financial gain. Reproduction for print media is prohibited unless there is expressed permission from the author, James L. Donahue, and/or Psiomni Ltd.
Even if Charles ordered the killings, why aren't all the Christians who fund and carry out genocides, witch hunts, inquisitions, etc. in prison then?
Charles Manson was a killer. He planned who would be killed, and also instructed his "family" how to commit the crime. Helter Skelter was supposed to show "blackie" how to kill, and start a revolution. The family was going to sit it out in the yellow submarine, a small bunker Manson had on a farm in California.
And the Christians who commit and fund genocides should be killed. not imprisoned, as that is a burden to the state, but killed. take them out back and shoot them in the head. They gave up their rights when they killed someone. Witch hunts haven't been around since Salem, and inquisitions even longer, now we just have asshats like Jack Thompson trying to ban forms of entertainment.
Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:09 pm
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8624 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
What editing can do
Interviews with Charles Manson are often slapped together like this:
Well he was on zionist South Park with a big swastika on his forehead so I'd guess it's propaganda.
Sat Nov 03, 2007 7:41 pm
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8624 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
So many people interpret South Park differently. For me, it's just good entertainment that makes you think.
Sat Nov 03, 2007 8:05 pm
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8624 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
More thoughts from Charles Manson
Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:12 am
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8624 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
Manson was one of the first media lies I remember seeing through. Seeing his interview with Rivera on tv as a youth just made me feel like they intentionally edited to make him look more of a nut than he was. I'm sure they've done things to him to make him a bit mental too (solitary confinement can do it). I wonder if he managed to create a self sustaining community free of taxes (slavery). A Jonestown without the religion or government program?
Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:30 pm
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8624 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
Charles Manson Superstar - 106 min
Quote:
In the late sixties, Charles Manson convinced a group of "followers" to move in to the California desert to train for the apocalypse. They eventually committed on of the most horrific string of serial murders in modern times. Considered to be one of the definitive documentaries about Manson and his infamous "family," CHARLES MANSON SUPERSTAR tells the killer's story with archival news footage, police photos, and an uncensored interview with Manson himself.
Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:36 pm
postcardsfrompalestine
Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 1737 Location: It means good luck - a chinese symbol
You can see
You can see why he would be so dangerous!
Quote:
"We're all our own prisons, we are all our
own wardens and we do our own time."
Quote:
"Prison's in your mind. . .
Can't you see I'm free?"
Quote:
"You invented the words, and you made the
dictionary and you gave me the dictionary
and you said, 'These are what the words mean.'
Well, this is what they mean to you, but to someone
else, they have got a different dictionary.'"
Thu May 01, 2008 9:01 pm
madthumbs
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8624 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
I'm surprised at the level of intelligence and mental health, this guy has despite being fed the common prison food, and institutionalization.
Quote:
"You invented the words, and you made the
dictionary and you gave me the dictionary
and you said, 'These are what the words mean.'
Well, this is what they mean to you, but to someone
else, they have got a different dictionary.'"
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 8624 Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa
Programmed to Kill: The Politics of Serial Murder
Quote:
Editorial Reviews
Product Description
The specter of the marauding serial killer has become a relatively common feature on the American landscape. Reactions to these modern-day monsters range from revulsion to morbid fascination--fascination that is either fed by, or a product of, the saturation coverage provided by print and broadcast media, along with a dizzying array of books, documentary films, websites, and "Movies of the Week".
The prevalence in Western culture of images of serial killers (and mass murderers) has created in the public mind a consensus view of what a serial killer is. Most people are aware, to some degree, of the classic serial killer 'profile.' But what if there is a much different 'profile'--one that has not received much media attention?
In Programmed to Kill, acclaimed and always controversial author David McGowan takes a fresh look at the lives of many of America's most notorious accused murderers, focusing on the largely hidden patterns that suggest that there may be more to the average serial killer story than meets the eye.
Think you know everything there is to know about serial killers? Or is it possible that sometimes what everyone 'knows' to be true isn't really true at all?
