Opposing Digits - Unconventional Awareness & Health Community Forum Index
RegisterSearchFAQMemberlistUsergroupsVlogHomeLog in
Foods they likely lied to us about!

 
Reply to topic    Opposing Digits - Unconventional Awareness & Health Community Forum Index » Basic Health & Nutrition
Foods they likely lied to us about!
Author Message
madthumbs



Joined: 22 Feb 2006
Posts: 8599
Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa

Post Foods they likely lied to us about! Reply with quote
---Work in progress---



---Will add submissions---


Last edited by madthumbs on Sun May 20, 2007 1:45 pm; edited 5 times in total
Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:41 am
Sponsor

Get the first human powered cell phone charger! -Get free shipping by entering promo code: QN6GX55X -pdf

alexclaton



Joined: 05 Mar 2006
Posts: 817
Location: Hell on earth

Post Reply with quote
garlic and onions?
Sun Mar 05, 2006 12:07 pm
madthumbs



Joined: 22 Feb 2006
Posts: 8599
Location: Fingerlakes - NY usa

Post Reply with quote
I knew someone would question that one! Now it's linked to a new post. Smile
Sun Mar 05, 2006 12:26 pm
kahotep



Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 65

Post Reply with quote
Its amazing how many people trust the government health programs. The food companies may, very well, have been lying to us about alot more than one would assume.

Apparently the FDA only checks to see if a label is on the box; it doesn't even check the food itself to see if the label is accurate! So there's no way of really knowing based upon some label.

http://www.mercola.com/2006/aug/5/food_labels_may_be_inaccurate_despite_fda_inspections.htm

Quote:
Food Labels May be Inaccurate, Despite FDA Inspections

An FDA report on efforts to get rid of misleading nutrition and health claims on food labels is misleading itself.

While the FDA report implies that more than 28,000 food labels were checked in a 14-month period, they only checked to see whether or not the Nutrition Facts panel was present, rather than whether or not it was accurate.

Bruce Silverglade, the legal director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), argued that "the accuracy of Nutrition Facts labels and misleading health-related claims ... have been the casualty of not only budget cuts, but a lack of commitment on the part of the Agency to fulfill its mission."

He went on to say that the FDA should crack down on inaccurate labeling such as deceptive "0 trans fat" claims and misleading "made with real fruit" statements, rather than simply glancing at labels.
CSPI urged Congress to increase funding to the FDA and direct the FDA to make systematic supermarket sweeps and accuracy tests of Nutrition Facts labels.

Sat Aug 05, 2006 1:54 pm
edisme



Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 2699
Location: NYC

Post Reply with quote
[quote]---Work in progress---

Margarine (and hydrogenated oils)
Soy
Canola
Aspartame (aspartic acid)
Garlic and Onions
Marijuana
Milk (especially pasteurized cows milk)

---Will add submissions---[quote]

You might want to add cashews in their raw form

thehealingcrow.com
here as well

I believe it is important to look back at what we ate instinctively before we look at
what was eaten for convenience such as when agriculuture came about.

There is a lot of info on this here Very Happy
Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:37 am
Display posts from previous:    
Reply to topic    Opposing Digits - Unconventional Awareness & Health Community Forum Index » Basic Health & Nutrition All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

AcidTechEX Design by Freestyle XL



Protected by Anti-Spam ACP