Bollyn/Thorn debate on The Piper Report

Posts: 49

Christopher Bollyn and Victor Thorn will debate on the Piper Report this Thursday. I look forward to seeing Bollyn wipe the floor with Thorn!

Posts: 98

I'm done with Piper, but I'll listen to that show.

Thanks, Suzette.

Posts: 1334

same with me.

Thorn and Giuliani are defending ADL and
Piper is defending them and attacking Eric for pointing that out?

I find it hilarious how in their newest article
http://wingtv.net/thorn2006/whalenpiper.html

	Quote:
	Now, with the recent arrest of Christopher Bollyn – as well as a plethora of lies being spread by Eric Hufschmid and Daryl Bradford Smith – another open debate has arisen.

they accuse Christopher and Eric of lying and their proven lies
they call as an
"open debate".
They are totally panicked - they accused Chris of faking being beaten, now that there is medical report out saying - possible fracture of elbow
- they call it "open debate".

:brushteeth:

Anyone doubting it = MAIL THOSE THINGS TO WINGTV and ask them to publish it!!!

Posts: 98

Scared bully liars know only one course of action to retaliate against people, like Eric and Daryl, that oppose them.

They collude with only the people that support them.

They detract from the facts of the issues with personal attacks and insults, like referring to the sound of Eric's voice.

And they yell the loudest and talk the longest in the vain attempt to defend themselves - like Israel.

We have to appreciate what Eric said yesterday on The French Connection, "if this is all they got - then we can beat them".

'Nuff said.

Posts: 8235

Eric was awesome! I loved that bit, and have thought the same thing for a while now! His voice seems to be improving too.

Posts: 49

Here is some very interesting food for thought that was submitted to me today!

"This whole sorted affair just keeps getting murkier and murkier.
>
>As far as the Danner incident is concerned it was Piper, Bollyn and Eric
>that interviewed him was it not, but it seems as if Piper is using the
>event to discredit Eric, not himself or Bollyn.
>
>Now, don't get me wrong I'm not implicating Bollyn in any of what Piper is
>doing, not yet....but something WE are unaware of is "rotten in Denmark".
>
>I still believe Danner was telling the truth and I also believe that
>several people got to him and shut him up...for good.
>
>I'm waiting with baited breath to hear the outcome on Mike's show today."

Posts: 86

Can someone provide a link to the debate audio file if/when available? Cheers.

Posts: 98

Link will be provided as soon as it's available - approximately 8:00 p.m. CST.

Hey, M!

Posts: 11

Repost from a different top:
----------------------------
I don't regularly listen to wingtv, however, I did on Monday, 8/21. The show is titled "Urgent Warning to American Free Press". The show was nothing more than a harangue of Eric. Within 8 minutes of the show,Scott and Lisa actually DEFENDED Eric's accusation that American Free Press did not publish Christopher Bolynn's four articles. Quoting Scott Mukaka
"Lisa had actually did a little digging and found the articles in question... and what where these articles about.. written by Christopher Bolynn that were UTLIMATELY REJECTED by the American Free Press.."
http://www.wingtv.net/todaysshow/humancheck_check.php
This statement was not retracted by either Lisa or Scott during the show.

Tell me, during Lisa's investigation , she did not know any of these articles, as according to Piper, were actually published? If
Piper is telling the truth, then Lisa is either a poor investigator implying Lisa and Scott's work should no longer be trusted due to their incompetence. I want to repeat, if Lisa actually investigated these four articles, she should without a doubt found out at least three of them were published by the American Free Press, as according to Piper. This is a no brainer.

Piper maintains at least three of them were published. Two of them on May 29, 2006 and the other was partially published but had a problem of being too "predictive"., whatever the hell that means. So they had to edit it. And by the way, he found this out after a little digging around. I tried a little digging around and couldn't find any of those articles. So I called rbn and requested Piper post links showing these articles were actually published on AFP.
If Piper is correct, how come he doesn't call Scott or Lisa Liars as he does to Eric??Or at least call them incompetent. What's the deal here?? Of course, during the interview, Piper showed admiration for Scott's work to the point I though he was going to blow Scott a kiss. I'm sure in the end Scott and Lisa will put some spin on what they meant by "rejected".

You know, something smells rotten in Denmark, but it ain't Daryl or Eric.

Posts: 98

Direct link to the broadcast -

The Piper Report

Posts: 1334

I encourage everyone to listen to that broadcast
to understand what a sack of lies Scott Makufka aka Victor Thorn is.
Read before the Rules of Disinformation - it will help you to understand who is lying and who is for real
http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1222

http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Piper/0608/20060824_Thu_Piper.mp3
+ Piper calls Eric a liar , since supposingly articles from Christopher were not censored from AFP

Why those articles DO NOT appear on AFP's website, nor in their archives then?
Other Bollyn's articles DO appear there.

And Makufka's questioning Bollyn whether AFP had been infiltrated or not, was to get him out of job - can you say something like that about your employeer?
About credibility of AFP - Szymanski is writing for them, wake up!!!!

Personally i still don't think Piper is some sort of agent.
His stupidity when it comes to mixing of human relationships with investigation is a huge warning.

Posts: 28

In Regards to Piper/Thorn/Bollyn interview...

A gentleman calls in and says that he is the Webmaster of "takingaim.info". Piper says, "Excellent Site!"

Is it???

DBS speaks of this site here -- http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_12June2006.html

If Daryl is correct, "takingaim" is covering, suppresing and confusing the Truth.

Why does Piper support "takingaim"?

Why does Piper continue to praise Stadtmiller? ***

Is Piper just a nice guy; is he nieve; or is he calculated???

You decide.

We know the details of 9-11. There is a Zionist at every major facet/corner, i.e. Chertoff - law enforcement.

Anyone who does not FIRST expose the Zionist connection is and should be an enemy to this Country, and to this movement.

Anyone taking sides with and supporting those who do not FIRST expose the Zionist connection should be monitored closely. Piper.....if you are reading this, don't be suspicious. It's your own fault that people like Daryl and Eric are wondering about you. Don't associate with the enemy. Period.

The enemy is those who hide or suppress the Zionist Connection. It is really very simple.

*** Stadtmiller allowed Zionist deniers to run rough shot over Eric H. Why would Stadtmiller do this?

Posts: 4

Regarding the supposedly censored Bollyn articles on AFP. I was always under the impression that the AFP online only displayed a selection of the articles. Only paid subscribers to the AFP get to see the full paper. Maybe this is why the searches of AFP web site don't show all the Bollyn articles and Piper may well be correct in saying that they were published but just not made visible on AFP web site. I personally have not tried searching so I stand by only what others have reported in saying that google search of AFP site comes up blank for these disputed articles. However AFP site does say that becoming a subscriber will open access to many more articles.

Posts: 1334

let's ask some subscriber.

Isnt it suspicious that articles which expose liars amongst "truthseekers" do not appear in free archives?

None of them.

Posts: 11

Again, this begs the questions as why Scott Makufka on his Aug 21 show say Bollyn's articles were ultimately rejected by the American Free Press. Did he get confimation of this from the American Free Press? I see an incosistency with Piper and Mukakka( I prefer this spelling of his name)